References

bibliosfera

Библиосфера

Bibliosphere

1815-31862712-7931

ГПНТБ СО РАН

bibliosfera-1194

Research Article

МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ НИР

METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCH WORK

Оценка научной продуктивности в зарубежном библиотековедении как составная часть измерения эффективности библиотеки

Assessment of research productivity in the foreign library science as a part of measuring the library effectiveness

Романов

П. С.

Romanov

P. S.

rom-peter@yandex.ru

Федеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение «Центральная научная сельскохозяйственная библиотека»Russian Federation

2015

20062015

0239

2015

Романов П.С.

Romanov P.S.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://www.bibliosphere.ru/jour/article/view/1194

Представлены результаты исследования по оценке баз данных и других источников информации, а также различных методов их исследования, применяемых в библиотековедении с целью ранжирования научной продуктивности библиотековедов США, а также преподавателей факультетов библиотековедения и информационных технологий. Идентифицированы методы и подходы к высокоточному ранжированию научной продуктивности или публикационной активности библиотековедов и преподавателей библиотечных вузов.

The article evaluates data bases and other sources of information, as well as research methods used to rank the research productivity of library scientists and lecturers of library and information technology faculties in the USA. Tools and methods are identified to study high accurate ranking of research productivity or publication activity of library scientists and teachers of library higher schools.

база данныхнаучная продуктивностьранжированиецитируемостьпубликационная активность профессорско-преподавательского составаэффективность деятельности библиотековедов и библиотечных учреждений

data baseresearch productivityresearch productivitypublication rankingcitationpublication activity of the teaching staffthe efficiency of library scientists and library institutions

References1

Нохрина В. А. Оценочные исследования в библиотеках и измерение качества библиотечных услуг // Библиотечное дело-2013 : материалы XVIII междунар. науч. конф. (24-25 апр. 2013 г.). - М., 2013. - Ч. 1. - С. 76.

Романов П. С. Аналитическая характеристика документного потока англоязычных диссертаций в области библиотековедения (по материалам США и Канады) : дис. … канд. пед. наук / Моск. гос. ун-т культуры и искусств. - М., 2006. - 220 с.

Романов П. С. Библиотековедение зарубежных стран во второй половине XX - начале XXI века. - М. : Хлебпродинформ, 2012. - 122 с.

Столяров Ю. Н. Анализ научной книги на основе закона Брэдфорда (на примере библиотечного фондоведения) // Научная книга на постсоветском пространстве : материалы II междунар. науч. конф. (Москва, 19-21 сент. 2007 г.). - М., 2007. - Ч. 1. - С. 223-226.

Blake V. L. P., Tjoumas R. Research as a factor in faculty evaluation: the rules are a-changin’ // Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. - 1988. - Vol. 31, № 1. - P. 3-24.

Bates M. J. The role of publication type in the evaluation of LIS programs // Library & Information Science Research. - 1998. - Vol. 20, № 2. - P. 187-198.

Boyce B. R., Hendren C. Authorship as a measure of the productivity of schools of library and information science // Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. - 1996. - Vol. 37, № 3. - P. 250-271.

Brace W. Quality assessment of library and information science school faculties // Education for Information. - 1992. - Vol. 10, № 2. - P. 115-123.

Budd J. M. Scholarly productivity of U.S. LIS faculty: an update // The Library Quarterly. - 2000. - Vol. 70, № 2. - P. 230-245.

Budd J. M., Seavey C. A. Productivity of U.S. library and information science faculty: the Hayes study revisited // The Library Quarterly. - 1996. - Vol. 66, № 1. - P. 1-20.

Coblans H. The literature of librarianship and documentation: the periodicals and their bibliographical control // Journal of Documentation. - 1972. - Vol. 28, № 1. - P. 56-66.

Cole S., Cole J. R. Scientific output and recognition // American Sociological Review. - 1967. - Vol. 32, № 3. - P. 377-390.

Cole S., Cole J. R. Visibility and the structural bases of awareness of scientific research // American Sociological Review. - 1968. - Vol. 33, № 3. - P. 397-413.

Cronin B. Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis // Journal of Information Science. - 2001. - Vol. 27, № 1. - P. 1-7.

Cronin B., Overfelt K. Citation-based auditing of academic performance // Journal of the American Society for Information Science. - 1994. - Vol. 45, № 2. - P. 61-72.

Danton J. P. Notes on the evaluation of library schools // Journal of Education for Librarianship. - 1983. - Vol. 24, № 2. - P. 106-116.

Elsbach K. D., Kramer R. M. Members’ responses to organizational identities: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings // Administrative Science Quarterly. - 1997. - Vol. 41, № 3. - P. 442-476.

Ernest D. J., Lange H. R., Herring D. An online comparison of three library science databases // RQ. - 1988. - Vol. 28, № 2. - P. 185-194.

Fogarty T. J., Saftner D. V. Academic department prestige: A new measure based on the doctoral student labor market // Research in Higher Education. - 1993. - Vol. 34, № 4. - P. 427-449.

Garland K. The nature of publications authored by library and information science faculty // Library and Information Science Research. - 1991. - Vol. 13, № 1. - P. 49-60.

Gilbert G. N. Measuring the growth of science: a review of indicators of scientific growth // Scientometrics. - 1978. - Vol. 1, № 1. - P. 9-34.

Gluck M. A review of journal coverage overlap with an extension to the definition of overlap // Journal of the American Society for Information Science. - 1990. - Vol. 41, № 1. - P. 43-60.

Hawkins D. T., Miller B. On-line data base coverage of the online information-retrieval literature // Online Review. - 1977. - Vol. 1, № 1. - P. 59-64.

Hayes R. M. Citation statistics as a measure of faculty research productivity // Journal of Education for Librarianship. - 1983. - Vol. 23, № 3. - P. 151-172.

LaBorie T., Halperin M. The ERIC and LISA databases: How the sources of library science literature compare // Database. - 1981. - Vol. 4, № 3. - P. 32-37.

LaBorie T., Halperin M., White H. D. Library and information science abstracting and indexing services: coverage, overlap, and context // Library & Information Science Research. - 1985. - Vol. 7, № 2. - P. 183-195.

Machung A. Playing the rankings game // Change. - 1998. - Vol. 30, № 4. - P. 12-16.

College rankings: democratized college knowledge for whom? / P. M. McDonough [et al.] // Research in Higher Education. - 1998. - Vol. 39, № 5. - P. 513-537.

Meho L. I., Spurgin K. M. Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: an evaluation of data sources and research methods // Journal of the American Society for information science and Technology. - 2005. - Vol. 56, № 12. - P. 1314-1331.

Monks J., Ehrenberg R. G. U.S. News and World Report’s college rankings: why do they matter? // Change. - 1999. - Vol. 31, № 6. - P. 42-52.

Mulvaney J. P. The characteristics associated with perceived quality in schools of library and information science // The Library Quarterly. - 1992. - Vol. 62, № 1. - P. 1-27.

Mulvaney J. P. The characteristics associated with perceived quality in schools of library and information science: an update and prediction // The Library Quarterly. - 1993. - Vol. 63, № 2. - P. 189-191.

Nisonger T. E. Citation autobiography: an investigation of ISI database coverage in determining author citedness // College and Research Libraries. - 2004. - Vol. 65, № 2. - P. 152-163.

Pettigrew K. E., Nicholls P. T. Publication patterns of LIS faculty from 1982-1992: effects of doctoral programs // Library & Information Science Research. - 1994. - Vol. 16, № 2. - P. 139-156.

Read E. J., Smith R. C. Searching for library and information science literature: a comparison of coverage in three databases // Library Computing. - 2000. - Vol. 19, № 1/2. - P. 118-126.

Reed K. L. Citation analysis of faculty publication: Beyond Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index // Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. - 1995. - Vol. 83, № 4. - P. 503-508.

Roush W. Grad schools ratings rankle // Science. - 1995. - Vol. 269, № 5231. - P. 1660-1662.

Smith L. C. Citation analysis // Library Trends. - 1981. - Vol. 30, № 1. - P. 83-106.

Stock W. A., Alston R. M. Effect of graduate-program rank on success in the job market // Journal of Economic Education. - 2000. - Vol. 31, № 4. - P. 389-401.

U.S. News and World Report. Library science: top schools. Retrieved 1999. - URL: http://www.usnews. com/usnews/edu/beyond/bcinfos.htm.

Van Raan A. F. J. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer-review based evaluation and foresight exercises // Scientometrics. - 1996. - Vol. 36, № 3. - P. 397-420.

Varlejs J., Dalrymple P. Publication output of library and information science faculty // Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. - 1986. - Vol. 27, № 1. - P. 71-89.

Wallace D. P. The most productive faculty // Library Journal. - 1990. - Vol. 115, № 8. - P. 61-63.

White H. D. Author co-citation analysis: overview and defense // Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. - Newbury Park, CA, 1990. - P. 84-106.

White H. S. Rankings of library and information science faculty and programs: The third in a series of studies undertaken at six-year intervals // The Library Quarterly. - 1993. - Vol. 63, № 2. - P. 166-188.

Wilson P. Factors affecting research productivity // Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. - 1979. - Vol. 20, № 1. - P. 3-24.

Yerkey A. A cluster analysis of several patterns among bibliographic databases // Journal of the American Society for Information Science. - 1983. - Vol. 34, № 5. - P. 350-355.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.