References

bibliosfera

Библиосфера

Bibliosphere

1815-31862712-7931

ГПНТБ СО РАН

10.20913/13/1815-3186-2020-3-15-36

bibliosfera-1637

Research Article

МИР БИБЛИОТЕК

LIBRARY WORLD

Изобретая себя: новые и зарождающиеся роли научных библиотек в канадских исследовательских университетах

Reinventing ourselves: new and emerging roles of academic librarians in Canadian research-intensive universities

Дукас

Ада

Ducas

Ada

ada.ducas@umanitoba.ca

Мишо-Ойстрик

Николь

Michaud-Oystryk

Nicole

nicole.michaud-oystryk@umanitoba.ca

Спир

Мари

Speare

Marie

marie.speare@umanitoba.ca

Университет МанитобыКанадаUniversity of ManitobaCanada

2020

19082020

031536

2020

Дукас А., Мишо-Ойстрик Н., Спир М.

Ducas A., Michaud-Oystryk N., Speare M.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://www.bibliosphere.ru/jour/article/view/1637

Суть академической библиотеки переосмысливается в связи с изменением научного ландшафта, трансформацией высшего образования и развитием технологий. Для изучения новых ролей библиотекарей был проведен опрос в исследовательских университетах Канады. Это исследование посвящено деятельности библиотекарей в следующих областях: поддержка научных исследований, преподавание и обучение, цифровая грамотность, развитие опыта пользователей и научные коммуникации. В нем рассматриваются масштабы и характер новых функций, навыки, необходимые для предоставления новых услуг, а также уверенность библиотекарей в своих способностях выполнять новые задачи. В статье также анализируется удовлетворенность библиотекарей своей работой и своим влиянием на университет.

The academic library profession is being redefined by the shifting research and scholarly landscape, the transformation in higher education, and advances in technology.

A survey of librarians working in Canada’s research-intensive universities was conducted to explore new and emerging roles. This study focuses on librarians’ activities in: Research Support, Teaching and Learning, Digital Scholarship, User Experience, and Scholarly Communication. It addresses the scope and nature of the new roles, the skills required to provide new services, and the confidence librarians have in their abilities to perform the new roles. It also reports on librarians’ job satisfaction and their perceived impact on the academic enterprise.

библиотекауниверситетКанадаподдержка научных исследованийцифровая грамотностьопыт пользователейнаучные коммуникацииуверенность в работетренингианкетирование

References1

Amsberry D, Benjes-Small C, Harrington S, Miller S, Mlinar C and Wilkinson CW (2017) Roles and strengths of teaching librarians. College & Research Libraries News 78(7): 364–370. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.78.7.364.

Antell K, Foote JB and Shults BC (2014) Dealing with data: science librarians’ participation in data management at association of research libraries institutions. College & Research Libraries 75(4): 557–574. https://doi.org/10.5860/ crl.75.4.557.

Auckland M (2012) Re-Skilling for research: an investigation into the role and skills of subject and liaison librarians required to effectively support the evolving information needs of researchers. London: Research Libraries.

Bell S (2011) Delivering a WOW user experience: do academic librarians measure up? Proceedings of Association of College and Research Libraries Conference (Philadelphia, March 30 – April 2, 2011). Philadelphia, 2011. URL: www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/2011/papers/delivering_wow.pdf (accessed 24.05.2018).

Bell SJ (2014) Staying true to the core: designing the future academic library experience. Libraries and the Academy 14(3): 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0021.

Bewick L and Corrall Sh (2010) Developing librarians as teachers: a study of their pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 42(2): 97–110. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0961000610361419.

Bowles-Terry M and Donovan C (2016) Serving notice on the one-shot: changing roles for instruction librarians. International Information & Library Review 48(2): 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1176457.

Bresnahan MM and Johnson AM (2013) Assessing scholarly communication and research data training needs. Reference Services Review 41(3): 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-01-2013-0003.

Brown RA, Wolski M and Richardson J (2015) Developing new skills for research support librarians. Australian Library Journal 64(3): 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2015.1041215.

Bryan JE (2016) The preparation of academic librarians who provide instruction: a comparison of first and second career librarians. Journal of Academic Librarianship 42(4): 340–354. https://doi-org.uml.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.05.010.

Cassella M and Morando M (2012) Fostering new roles for librarians: skills set for repository managers: results of a survey in Italy. LIBER Quarterly: Journal of European Research Libraries 21(3/4): 407–428.

Chadwell F and Sutton SC (2014) The future of open access and library publishing. New Library World 115(5/6): 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-05-2014-0049.

Cooper ID and Crum JA (2013) New activities and changing roles of health sciences librarians: a systematic review, 1990–2012. Journal of the Medical Library Association 101(4): 268–277. https://doi.org/ 10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.008.

Corrall Sh, Kennan MA and Afzal W (2013) Bibliometrics and research data management services: emerging trends in library support for research. Library Trends 61(3): 636–674. https://doi.org/ 10.1353/lib.2013.0005.

Cox AM and Corrall Sh (2013) Evolving academic library specialties. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(8): 1526–1542. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22847.

Cox AM and Pinfield S (2014) Research data management and libraries: current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 46(4): 299–316. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0961000613492542.

Cox AM, Kennan MA and Pinfield S (2017) Developments in research data management in academic libraries: towards an understanding of research data service maturity. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68(9): 2182–2200. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23781.

Gabridge T (2009) The last mile: liaison roles in curating science and engineering research data. Research Library 265: 15–21. https://doi.org/10.29242/rli.265.

Garritano JR and Carlson JR (2009) A subject librarian’s guide to collaborating on e-science projects. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 57: 140. https://doi.org/10.5062/F42B8VZ3.

Gwyer R (2015) Identifying and exploring future trends impacting on academic libraries: a mixed methodology using journal content analysis, focus groups, and trend reports. New Review of Academic Librarianship 21(3): 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1026452.

Henty M (2008) Dreaming of data: the library’s role in supporting e-research and data management. The Australian Library and Information Association Biennial Conference (Alice Springs, Australia, September 2–5, 2008). Alice Springs, Dreaming 08, pp. 1–10.

Hess AN (2016) A case study of job-embedded learning. Libraries and the Academy 16(2): 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2016.0021.

Horenstein B (1993) Job satisfaction of academic librarians: an examination of the relationships between satisfaction, faculty status, and participation. College & Research Libraries 54(3): 255–269. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_54_03_255.

Jaguszewski JM and Williams K (2013) New roles for new times: transforming liaison roles in research libraries. Washington: Association of Research Libraries. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1779.7925.

Julien H and Genuis SK (2011) Librarians’ experiences of the teaching role: a national survey of librarians. Library & Information Science Research 33(2): 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.09.005.

Keller A (2015) Research support in Australian university libraries: an outsider view. Australian Academic & Research Libraries 46(2): 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2015.1009528.

Kennan MA, Corrall Sh and Afzal W (2014) ‘Making space’ in practice and education: research support services in academic libraries. Library Management 35(8/9): 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-03-2014-0037.

King M (2018) Digital scholarship librarian: what skills and competences are needed to be a collaborative librarian. International Information & Library Review 50(1): 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317. 2017.1422898.

Klain-Gabbay L and Shoham S (2016) Scholarly communication and academic librarians. Library & Information Science Research 38: 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.04.004.

Larivière V and Sugimoto CR (2018) Do authors comply with mandates for open access? Nature 562(7728): 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w.

Lasthiotakis H, Kretz A and Sá C (2015) Open science strategies in research policies: a comparative exploration of Canada, the US and the UK. Policy Futures in Education 13(8): 968–989. https://doi. org/10.1177/1478210315579983.

Leckie GJ and Brett J (1997) Job satisfaction of Canadian university librarians: a national survey. College & Research Libraries 58(1): 31–47. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.58.1.31.

Lewis M (2010) Libraries and the management of research data. Envisioning future academic library services initiatives, ideas and challenges. London: Facet Publ., pp. 145–168.

MacDonald CM (2015) User experience librarians: user advocates, user researchers, usability evaluators, or all of the above? Proceedings of the ASIS&T Annual Meeting 52: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010055.

MacDonald CM (2017) ‘It takes a village’: on UX librarianship and building UX capacity in libraries. Journal of Library Administration 57(2): 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2016.1232942.

Nero N and Langley A (2017) Subject liaisons in academic libraries: an open access data set from 2015. Libraries and the Academy 17(1): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0001.

Pryor G and Donnelly M (2009) Skilling up to do data: whose role, whose responsibility, whose career? International Journal of Digital Curation 4(2): 158–170. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v4i2.105.

Riley-Huff DA and Rholes JM (2011) Librarians and technology skill acquisition: issues and perspectives. Information Technology and Libraries 30(3): 129–140. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v30i3.1770.

Robertson M (2015) Perceptions of Canadian provosts on the institutional role of academic libraries. College & Research Libraries 76(4): 490–511. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.4.490.

Sula CA (2013) Digital humanities and libraries: a conceptual model. Journal of Library Administration 53(1): 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.756680.

Swan A and Brown Sh (2008) The skills, role and career structure of data scientists and curators: an assessment of current practice and future needs: report to the JISC. Bristol: Joint Information Systems Committee.

Tenopir C, Birch B and Allard S (2012) Academic libraries and research data services: current practices and plans for the future: an ACRL white paper. Washington: Association of College & Research Libraries.

Tenopir C, Hughes D, Allard S, Frame M, Birch B, Baird L, Sandusky R, Langseth M and Lundeen A. (2015) Research data services in academic libraries: data intensive roles for the future? Journal of eScience Librarianship 4(2): e1085. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2015.1085.

Tenopir C, Sansunsky RJ and Birch B (2014) Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians. Library and Information Science Research 36(2): 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.11.003.

Tenopir C, Sansunsky RJ, Allard SL and Birch B (2013) Academic librarians and research data services: preparation and attitudes. IFLA Journal 39(1): 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035212473089.

Tenopir C, Talja S, Horstmann W, Late E, Hughes D, Pollock D, Schmidt B, Baird L, Sandusky RJ and Allard S (2017) Research data services in European academic research libraries. LIBER Quarterly: Journal of European Research Libraries 27(1): 23–44. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10180.

Vandegrift M (2012) What is digital humanities and what’s it doing in the library? In the Library with the Lead Pipe 2: 1–7.

Vandegrift M and Varner S (2013) Evolving in common: creating mutually supportive relationships between libraries and the digital humanities. Journal of Library Administration 53(1): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.756699.

Vassilakaki E and Moniarou-Papaconstantinou V (2015) A systematic literature review informing library and information professionals’ emerging roles. New Library World 116(1/2): 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-05-2014-0060.

Waite K, Gannon-Leary P and Carr J (2011) The role and responsibilities of an e-tutor librarian. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning 5(4): 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/153329 0X.2011.634980.

Westbrock T and Fabian S (2010) Proficiencies for instruction librarians: is there still a disconnect between professional education and professional responsibilities? College & Research Libraries 71(6): 569–590. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-75r1.

Zhang L and Watson EM (2017) Measuring the impact of gold and green open access. Journal of Academic Librarianship 43(4): 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.004.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.