bibliosferaБиблиосфераBibliosphere1815-31862712-7931ГПНТБ СО РАН10.20913/1815-3186-2020-2-83-95bibliosfera-1660Research ArticleОБМЕН ОПЫТОМEXPERIENCE EXCHANGEРешения по представлению поисковых уровней, конфигурации и стратегии поискаDiscovery layer decisions, configurations and strategieshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-1544ШварцР.SchwartzR.

Рэймонд Шварц, магистр библиотековедения, доцент, заведующий отделом библиотечных информационных систем

Нью-Джерси, Уэйн

Raymond Schwartz, Masters of Library Science, Associate Professor, Head of Library Information Systems

New Jersey, Wayne

schwartzr2@wpunj.eduУниверситет Вильяма ПатерсонаСоединённые Штаты АмерикиWilliam Paterson UniversityUnited States202020072020028395Copyright © Шварц Р., 20202020Шварц Р.Schwartz R.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bibliosphere.ru/jour/article/view/1660

При поиске через поисковые уровни, связанные с базой знаний, читатели часто сталкиваются с проблемой, о решении которой говорится в немногих исследованиях. Чтобы начать дискуссию, автор распространил анкету среди университетских библиотек с просьбой принять участие в трех панельных дискуссиях с октября 2018 г. по июнь 2019 г. для обсуждения того, как они решают эту проблему. Приглашение приняли пять библиотек университетов. В статье рассматриваются подходы этих пяти американских университетских библиотечных систем, чтобы поощрить дальнейшее изучение ими вопросов проектирования, внедрения и ведения интерфейсов для поисковых уровней. Полученные выводы указывают на эволюционирующий характер интерфейсов поисковых уровней и борьбу библиотек за адаптацию своих потребностей к этому все еще меняющемуся типу продукта. В рамках этой группы более крупные университеты с бóльшими финансовыми и кадровыми ресурсами разработали интерфейс «bento box» с программным обеспечением с открытым исходным кодом, в то время как другие университеты с меньшими средствами решили создать различные варианты для своих прописанных собственных уровней поиска для удовлетворения своих конкретных институциональных потребностей и конкретных потребностей своих пользователей. Необходимо провести статистически значимое исследование с тщательным сравнением юзабилити-тестирования, чтобы увидеть, как эти и другие факторы проявляются в более широкой области.

The problem that patrons frequently encounter with searching via a discovery layer linked to a knowledgebase is the overwhelming number of hits. Few if any research or discussion compares how libraries resolve this difficulty. To begin a discussion, the author disseminated an open invitation for academic libraries to participate on three panels from October 2018 to June 2019 to discuss their implementation processes and decisions. Five academic libraries accepted the invitation. This paper reviews the approaches of the five American academic library systems with the intent to encourage further examination of the issues of design, implementation, and maintenance of discovery layers. The conclusions reached point to the evolving nature of discovery layer interfaces and the struggle for libraries to adapt their needs to this still changing product type. Within this group, the larger institutions with more financial and staff resources have designed a ‘’bento box’’ interface with open source software, while the other institutions with lesser means have chosen to create different instances of their subscribed proprietary discovery layers to meet their specific institutional demands and the specific needs of their patrons. A statistically relevant examination with rigorous comparison of usability testing would have to be done to see how these and other factors play out in the wider field.

уровни поискапоиск информациибиблиотечная услугаинтернет-поискпоиск ресурсовбиблиотеки университетовdiscovery layerslibrary discovery serviceweb-scale discoveryresource discovery serviceacademic librariesReferencesAharony N and Prebor G (2015) Librarians’ and information professionals’ perspectives towards discovery tools – an exploratory study. Journal of Academic Librarianship 41(4): 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.05.003.Aharony N and Prebor G (2015) Librarians’ and information professionals’ perspectives towards discovery tools – an exploratory study. Journal of Academic Librarianship 41(4): 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.05.003.Bonner S and Williams G (2016) A small academic library and the power of EBSCO discovery service. Serials Review 42(3): 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2016.1205428.Bonner S and Williams G (2016) A small academic library and the power of EBSCO discovery service. Serials Review 42(3): 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2016.1205428.Boyer G, Bacon V and Hill K (2014) Creating a cohesive discovery service. Serials Review 40(3): 200–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2014.949549.Boyer G, Bacon V and Hill K (2014) Creating a cohesive discovery service. Serials Review 40(3): 200–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2014.949549.DeMars JM (2017) Discovering our users: a multicampus usability study of primo. IFLA WLIC2017, Wroclaw. URL: http://library.ifla.org/1810/1/S10-2017-demars-en.pdf (accessed 12.04.2019).DeMars JM (2017) Discovering our users: a multicampus usability study of primo. IFLA WLIC2017, Wroclaw. URL: http://library.ifla.org/1810/1/S10-2017-demars-en.pdf (accessed 12.04.2019).Dempsey M and Valenti AM (2016) Student use of keywords and limiters in web-scale discovery searching. Journal of Academic Librarianship 42(3): 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.03.002.Dempsey M and Valenti AM (2016) Student use of keywords and limiters in web-scale discovery searching. Journal of Academic Librarianship 42(3): 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.03.002.Doğan G and Doğan SC (2013) Evaluation of web discovery services: reflections from Turkey. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 73: 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.074.Doğan G and Doğan SC (2013) Evaluation of web discovery services: reflections from Turkey. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 73: 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.074.Foster AK (2018) Determining librarian research preferences: a comparison survey of web-scale discovery systems and subject databases. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(3): 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.04.001.Foster AK (2018) Determining librarian research preferences: a comparison survey of web-scale discovery systems and subject databases. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(3): 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.04.001.Hanneke R and O’Brien KK (2016) Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research. Journal of Medical Library Association 104(2): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.5195/JMLA.2016.52.Hanneke R and O’Brien KK (2016) Comparison of three web-scale discovery services for health sciences research. Journal of Medical Library Association 104(2): 109–117. https://doi.org/10.5195/JMLA.2016.52.Johnston L and Brown C (2017) It takes two to tango… Public services and information technology staff collaborate to launch a new discovery system. IFLA WLIC-2017, Wroclaw. URL: http://library.ifla.org/1793/ (accessed 12.04.2019).Johnston L and Brown C (2017) It takes two to tango… Public services and information technology staff collaborate to launch a new discovery system. IFLA WLIC-2017, Wroclaw. URL: http://library.ifla.org/1793/ (accessed 12.04.2019).Kumar V (2018) Selecting an appropriate web-scale discovery service: a study of the big 4’s. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 38(6): 396–402. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.6.12860.Kumar V (2018) Selecting an appropriate web-scale discovery service: a study of the big 4’s. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 38(6): 396–402. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.38.6.12860.Lee B and Chung E (2016) An analysis of web-scale discovery services from the perspective of user’s relevance judgment. Journal of Academic Librarianship 42(5): 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.016.Lee B and Chung E (2016) An analysis of web-scale discovery services from the perspective of user’s relevance judgment. Journal of Academic Librarianship 42(5): 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.016.Marvin S (2017) Voyager to ALMA – space to soul process for discovery systems adaptation to changing search environments. IFLA WLIC-2017, Wroclaw. URL: http://library.ifla.org/1733/ (accessed 12.04.2019).Marvin S (2017) Voyager to ALMA – space to soul process for discovery systems adaptation to changing search environments. IFLA WLIC-2017, Wroclaw. URL: http://library.ifla.org/1733/ (accessed 12.04.2019).Minkin RM and Tobias C (2017) Bridging the (unit) divide: applying user experience to a discovery layer. IFLA WLIC-2017, Wroclaw. URL: http://library.ifla.org/1817/ (accessed 12.04.2019).Minkin RM and Tobias C (2017) Bridging the (unit) divide: applying user experience to a discovery layer. IFLA WLIC-2017, Wroclaw. URL: http://library.ifla.org/1817/ (accessed 12.04.2019).Narayanan N and Byers DF (2017) Improving web scale discovery services. Social Science Research Network pap. ID 3139357. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3139357 (accessed 12.04.2019).Narayanan N and Byers DF (2017) Improving web scale discovery services. Social Science Research Network pap. ID 3139357. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3139357 (accessed 12.04.2019).O’Connell R (2019) Beyond the bento: a new discovery experience at smith college. Information Today. URL: http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/mar19/OConnell-Beyond-the-Bento-A-New-DiscoveryExperience-at-Smith-College.shtml (accessed 26.10.2019).O’Connell R (2019) Beyond the bento: a new discovery experience at smith college. Information Today. URL: http://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/mar19/OConnell-Beyond-the-Bento-A-New-DiscoveryExperience-at-Smith-College.shtml (accessed 26.10.2019).Rochkind J (2012) Article search improvement strategy. Bibliographic Wilderness. URL: https://bibwild.wordpress.com/2012/10/02/article-searchimprovement-strategy/ (accessed 26.10.2019).Rochkind J (2012) Article search improvement strategy. Bibliographic Wilderness. URL: https://bibwild.wordpress.com/2012/10/02/article-searchimprovement-strategy/ (accessed 26.10.2019).Rodríguez- Bravo B and Frías J-A (2017) Resource discovery services versus OPACs in information searching. IFLA WLIC-21017, Wroclaw. URL http://library.ifla.org/1816/ (accessed 26.10.2019).Rodríguez- Bravo B and Frías J-A (2017) Resource discovery services versus OPACs in information searching. IFLA WLIC-21017, Wroclaw. URL http://library.ifla.org/1816/ (accessed 26.10.2019).Shapiro S (2018) Academic librarians, information overload, and the Tao of discovery. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(5): 671–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.004.Shapiro S (2018) Academic librarians, information overload, and the Tao of discovery. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(5): 671–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.004.Spezi V, Creaser C and Conyers A (2015) The impact of RDS on usage of electronic content in UK academic libraries: selected results from a UKSG-funded project. Serials Review 41(2): 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2015.1035991.Spezi V, Creaser C and Conyers A (2015) The impact of RDS on usage of electronic content in UK academic libraries: selected results from a UKSG-funded project. Serials Review 41(2): 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2015.1035991.Varnum K (2017) Unifying the library discovery experience. University of Michigan Library blogs. URL: https://www.lib.umich.edu/blogs/library-tech-talk/unifyinglibrary-discovery-experience (accessed 26.10.2019).Varnum K (2017) Unifying the library discovery experience. University of Michigan Library blogs. URL: https://www.lib.umich.edu/blogs/library-tech-talk/unifyinglibrary-discovery-experience (accessed 26.10.2019).Wang X, Cui Y and Xu S (2018) Evaluating the impact of web-scale discovery services on scholarly content seeking. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(5): 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.05.010.Wang X, Cui Y and Xu S (2018) Evaluating the impact of web-scale discovery services on scholarly content seeking. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(5): 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.05.010.Welborn A (2014). Bento searching is here! Duke University Libraries blogs. URL: https://blogs.library.duke.edu/blog/2014/08/21/bento-searching/ (accessed 26.10.2019).Welborn A (2014). Bento searching is here! Duke University Libraries blogs. URL: https://blogs.library.duke.edu/blog/2014/08/21/bento-searching/ (accessed 26.10.2019).Wells D (2016) Library discovery systems and their users: a case study from Curtin University Library. Australian Academic & Research Libraries 47(2): 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2016.1187249.Wells D (2016) Library discovery systems and their users: a case study from Curtin University Library. Australian Academic & Research Libraries 47(2): 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2016.1187249.Žabička P (2017) Knihovny.cz – building a discovery portal for Czech libraries. IFLA WLIC-2017, Wroclaw. URL: http://library.ifla.org/1814/ (accessed 26.10.2019).Žabička P (2017) Knihovny.cz – building a discovery portal for Czech libraries. IFLA WLIC-2017, Wroclaw. URL: http://library.ifla.org/1814/ (accessed 26.10.2019).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.