bibliosferaБиблиосфераBibliosphere1815-31862712-7931ГПНТБ СО РАН10.20913/1815-3186-2025-4-127-137bibliosfera-2184Research ArticleОБЗОРЫOVERVIEWSИстория и современные реалии коммуникации науки и общества в ЯпонииHistory and State-of-Art of Science Communication in Japanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0329-414XБусыгинаТ. В.BusyginaT. V.

Бусыгина Татьяна Владимировна, кандидат биологических наук, заведующий отделом научной библиографии

ул. Восход, 15, Новосибирск,  630102

Busygina Tatiana Vladimirovna, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Head of the Department of Scientific Bibliography

15 Voskhod St., Novosibirsk, 630102

Busygina@spsl.nsc.ruГосударственная публичная научно-техническая библиотека Сибирского отделения Российской академии наукРоссияState Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation20252802202604127137Copyright © Бусыгина Т.В., 20262026Бусыгина Т.В.Busygina T.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bibliosphere.ru/jour/article/view/2184

В статье рассматриваются ключевые этапы становления и развития коммуникации науки и общества (КНО) в Японии. Анализируется влияние государственной политики, культурных факторов и крупных кризисов на эволюцию форм научной коммуникации — от традиционного просвещения к диалоговым и цифровым моделям. Особое внимание уделено переходу от модели ОПНиТ (общественное понимание науки и технологий) к ВОНиТ (вовлечение общественности в науки и технологии), а также роли катастрофы на АЭС Фукусима-1 в переосмыслении роли науки в обществе. Японский опыт КНО представляет уникальный пример сочетания высоких технологий с уважением к традиционным ценностям знания.

The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the historical development and current state of science communication in Japan. It examines key stages in the evolution of this type of communication – from the postwar “Public Understanding of Science and Technology” model, which focused on fostering citizen understanding and support for science and technology, to more modern dialogic and interactive approaches that involve active public participation in the discussion of scientific and technological issues, known as the “Public Engagement in Science and Technology Model”. Particular attention is paid to the influence of government policy, cultural traditions, and major social crises, particularly the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, which marked a turning point in rethinking the role of science in society and sparked a surge in bottom-up initiatives. Key institutional initiatives are examined, such as the creation of the Japan Science Foundation, the launch of Science and Technology Week, the opening of the Miraikan Museum, the Science Agora forum, and the development of science café. It shows how Japan, while maintaining respect for scientific expertise and traditional values, is gradually integrating elements of open dialogue, digital formats, and civic participation into its scientific communication system. The Japanese experience is viewed as the unique example of a harmonious combination of high technology, government regulation, and cultural specificity, making it relevant for other countries, including Russia, striving for sustainable and trusting interactions between science and society in the face of modern challenges.

коммуникация науки и обществаЯпониянаучная грамотностьобщественное понимание науки и технологийвовлечение общественности в наукуscience communicationJapanscientific literacypublic engagement with science and technologypublic understanding of sciencepublic awareness of scienceСтатья подготовлена по плану НИР ГПНТБ СО РАН, проект «Современное состояние и тенденции развития коммуникаций российской науки с обществом», № 122040600059-7ReferencesАвдулов А. Н., Кулькин А. М. Государственная научно-техническая политика Японии: основные этапы и направления. Москва : ИНИОН РАН, 2000. 342 с.Avdulov AN and Kul’kin AM (2000) National science and technology policy of Japan: main stages and directions. Moscow: INION RAN. (In Russ.)].Горячева Е. А., Мостовая А. С. Государственная политика Японии в области науки в конце XX – начале XXI в. // Россия и АТР. 2023. № 2. С. 155–173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1026-8804-2023-2-155-173Goryacheva EA and Mostovaya AS (2023) National science policy of Japan in the late 20th – early 21st centuries. Rossiya i ATR 2: 155–173. (In Russ.)]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1026-8804-2023-2-155-173Briggs P (2001) New visions for Associations for the Advancement of Science: a case study. Science communication in theory and practice. Kluwer Acad. Publ., pp. 191–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0620-0_13Briggs P (2001) New visions for Associations for the Advancement of Science: a case study. Science communication in theory and practice. Kluwer Acad. Publ., pp. 191–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0620-0_13Chilvers J and Kearnes M (eds) (2015) Remaking participation: science, environment and emergent publics. London, New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797693Chilvers J and Kearnes M (eds) (2015) Remaking participation: science, environment and emergent publics. London, New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797693Durant JR, Evans GA and Thomas GP (1989) The public understanding of science. Nature 340 (6228): 11–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/340011a0Durant JR, Evans GA and Thomas GP (1989) The public understanding of science. Nature 340 (6228): 11–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/340011a0Ema A (2015) Science, technology and society class program at a university: a report of teaching technology assessment and research ethics. Japanese Journal of Science Communication 18: 3–16.Ema A (2015) Science, technology and society class program at a university: a report of teaching technology assessment and research ethics. Japanese Journal of Science Communication 18: 3–16.Fujigaki Y (2009) STS in Japan and East Asia: governance of science and technology and public engagement. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal 3 (4): 511–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/s12280-009-9110-9Fujigaki Y (2009) STS in Japan and East Asia: governance of science and technology and public engagement. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal 3 (4): 511–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/s12280-009-9110-9Fujigaki Y and Hirono Y (2008) Theoretical perspective for science communication. Tokyo: Univ. of Tokyo Press.Fujigaki Y and Hirono Y (2008) Theoretical perspective for science communication. Tokyo: Univ. of Tokyo Press.Gascoigne T [et al] (eds) (2020) Communicating science: a global perspective. Canberra: ANU Press.Gascoigne T [et al] (eds) (2020) Communicating science: a global perspective. Canberra: ANU Press.Hirakawa H (2010) Kagaku ha dare no mono ka [Who owns science?]. Tokyo: NHK. (In Jap.).Hirakawa H (2010) Kagaku ha dare no mono ka [Who owns science?]. Tokyo: NHK. (In Jap.).Ishihara-Shineha S (2017) Persistence of the deficit model in Japan’s science communication: analysis of White papers on science and technology. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal 11 (3): 305–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-3819961Ishihara-Shineha S (2017) Persistence of the deficit model in Japan’s science communication: analysis of White papers on science and technology. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal 11 (3): 305–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-3819961Kobayashi T (2007) Toransu saiensu no jidai [The age of trans-s cience]. Tokyo: NTT Publ. (In Jap.).Kobayashi T (2007) Toransu saiensu no jidai [The age of trans-s cience]. Tokyo: NTT Publ. (In Jap.).Mizumachi E, Matsuda K, Kano K, Kawakami M and Kato K (2011) Scientists’ attitudes toward a dialogue with the public: a study using ‘science cafes’. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 10 (4): A02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.10040202Mizumachi E, Matsuda K, Kano K, Kawakami M and Kato K (2011) Scientists’ attitudes toward a dialogue with the public: a study using ‘science cafes’. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 10 (4): A02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.10040202Nagahama H (1994) Scientific literacy in Japan: historical and cultural permeation and current changes. When science becomes culture: world survey of scientific culture. Univ. of Ottawa Press, pp. 205–303. Nagahama H, Kuwahara T and Nishimoto A (1991) Science, technology, society and communication: NISTEP report NR:017. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy: website. (In Jap.). URL: https://www.nistep.go.jp/en/?page_id=3800 (accessed 09.10.2025).Nagahama H (1994) Scientific literacy in Japan: historical and cultural permeation and current changes. When science becomes culture: world survey of scientific culture. Univ. of Ottawa Press, pp. 205–303. Nagahama H, Kuwahara T and Nishimoto A (1991) Science, technology, society and communication: NISTEP report NR:017. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy: website. (In Jap.). URL: https://www.nistep.go.jp/en/?page_id=3800 (accessed 09.10.2025).Nakamura K (1991) Bunka to shite no kagaku no kakuritsu ni mukete: Saiensu komyunikēshon puraza kōsō [Establishing science as culture: proposal for science communication plaza]. Nippon Inst. for Research Advancement. (In Jap.).Nakamura K (1991) Bunka to shite no kagaku no kakuritsu ni mukete: Saiensu komyunikēshon puraza kōsō [Establishing science as culture: proposal for science communication plaza]. Nippon Inst. for Research Advancement. (In Jap.).Nakamura M (2011) Policy on promoting science and technology communication. A social history of science & technology in Japan at the turn of the century. Hara Shobo, pp. 233–255.Nakamura M (2011) Policy on promoting science and technology communication. A social history of science & technology in Japan at the turn of the century. Hara Shobo, pp. 233–255.Ogawa Y, Kamei O and Shimizu M (2006) A training program for science communication in collaboration with universities and museums. Proceedings of PCST 2006 Conference (Seoul). [Seoul], pp. 1359–1364.Ogawa Y, Kamei O and Shimizu M (2006) A training program for science communication in collaboration with universities and museums. Proceedings of PCST 2006 Conference (Seoul). [Seoul], pp. 1359–1364.Rauchfleisch A and Schäfer MS (2018) Structure and development of science communication research: co-citation analysis of a developing field. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 17 (3): A07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17030207Rauchfleisch A and Schäfer MS (2018) Structure and development of science communication research: co-citation analysis of a developing field. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 17 (3): A07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17030207Schiele B, Claessens M and Shi S (eds) (2012) Science communication in the world: practices, theories and trends. Dordrecht: Springer.Schiele B, Claessens M and Shi S (eds) (2012) Science communication in the world: practices, theories and trends. Dordrecht: Springer.Shineha R (2016) History and issues of science communication: a review of discussions and perspectives in policy-m aking. Seijo Communication Studies 27: 13–29.Shineha R (2016) History and issues of science communication: a review of discussions and perspectives in policy-m aking. Seijo Communication Studies 27: 13–29.Stocklmayer SM, Gore MM and Bryant C (eds) (2001) Science communication in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0620-0Stocklmayer SM, Gore MM and Bryant C (eds) (2001) Science communication in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0620-0Trench B (2008) Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. Communicating science in social contexts: new models, new practices. Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 119–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_7Trench B (2008) Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. Communicating science in social contexts: new models, new practices. Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 119–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_7Umehara S, Yoshida K and Watanabe M (2012) Science Agora: the evolving science festival and its roles in Japan’s science communication policy-making. AAAS General Poster Session (February 19, 2012). URL: https://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2012/webprogram/Paper7294.html (accessed 09.10.2025).Umehara S, Yoshida K and Watanabe M (2012) Science Agora: the evolving science festival and its roles in Japan’s science communication policy-making. AAAS General Poster Session (February 19, 2012). URL: https://aaas.confex.com/aaas/2012/webprogram/Paper7294.html (accessed 09.10.2025).Watanabe M (2017) From top-down to bottom-up: a short history of science communication policy in Japan. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 16 (3): Y01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16030401Watanabe M (2017) From top-down to bottom-up: a short history of science communication policy in Japan. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 16 (3): Y01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16030401Watanabe M and Imai K (2003) Research on the promotion of public understanding of science and technology and science communication: NISTEP research material RM:100. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy: website. URL: https://www.nistep.go.jp/en/?page_id=3800#a3 (accessed 09.10.2025).Watanabe M and Imai K (2003) Research on the promotion of public understanding of science and technology and science communication: NISTEP research material RM:100. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy: website. URL: https://www.nistep.go.jp/en/?page_id=3800#a3 (accessed 09.10.2025).Watanabe M and Imai K (2005) A discussion about the promotion of science and technology communication: NISTEP discussion paper DP:039. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy: website. (In Jap.). URL: https://www.nistep.go.jp/en/?page_id=3800#a4 (accessed 09.10.2025).Watanabe M and Imai K (2005) A discussion about the promotion of science and technology communication: NISTEP discussion paper DP:039. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy: website. (In Jap.). URL: https://www.nistep.go.jp/en/?page_id=3800#a4 (accessed 09.10.2025).Watanabe M and Kudo M (2020) Japan: western science and Japanese culture. Communicating Science: a Global Perspective. Canberra, pp. 521–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22459/CS.2020.22 (1985)Watanabe M and Kudo M (2020) Japan: western science and Japanese culture. Communicating Science: a Global Perspective. Canberra, pp. 521–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22459/CS.2020.22 (1985)The public understanding of science: report of a Royal Society ad hoc Group endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. London: The Royal Society. URL: https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/publications/1985/10700.pdf (accessed 09.10.2025).The public understanding of science: report of a Royal Society ad hoc Group endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. London: The Royal Society. URL: https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/publications/1985/10700.pdf (accessed 09.10.2025).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.