bibliosferaБиблиосфераBibliosphere1815-31862712-7931ГПНТБ СО РАН10.20913/1815-3186-2017-1-83-92bibliosfera-321Research ArticleНАУКА В ЦИФРАХSCIENCE IN FIGURESБиблиометрия в сфере нанотехнологий: сравнительный анализ достижений России и других странBibliometry in the nanotechnology field: a comparative analysis of achievements in Russia and other countriesТереховА. И.TerekhovA. I.

кандидат физико-математических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник лаборатории прикладной эконометрики,

Москва

Moscow

a.i.terekhov@mail.ruЦентральный экономико-математический институт Российской академии наукРоссияCentral Economic-Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation201730032017018392Copyright © Терехов А.И., 20172017Терехов А.И.Terekhov A.I.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.bibliosphere.ru/jour/article/view/321

Выполнен сравнительный анализ научной производительности России в области нанотехнологий. Исходная выборка публикаций извлечена из базы данных Science Citation Index Expanded по релевантным ключевым словам. Анализируются количество публикаций, цитируемость, международное соавторство и его влияние на цитируемость для России и ряда отобранных стран из числа наиболее активных в данной области. Обсуждены некоторые промежуточные итоги выполнения российской нанотехнологической программы.

The article presents a comparative analysis of scientific performance of Russia in the field of nanotechnology. An initial corpus of publications was extracted from the Science Citation Index Expanded database through relevant keywords. It analyzes publications number, their citation, international co-authorship and its influence on citation for Russia and some countries among the most active in the field. Some intermediate results of implementing the Russian nanotechnology program are discussed.

нанотехнологиипубликацияцитируемостьмеждународное соавторствоnanotechnologypublicationcitationinternational co-authorshipReferencesБусыгина Т. В., Лаврик О. Л., Мандринина Л. А., Балуткина Н. А. База данных «Труды сотрудников НИУ СО РАН по наноструктурам, наноматериалам и нанотехнологиям»: структура и возможности наукометрических исследований на ее основе // Библиосфера. 2010. Т. 4. C. 53–60.Busygina T. V., Lavrik O. L., Mandrinina L. A., Balutkina N. A. Database «Proceedings of employees of SB RAS on nanostructures, nanomaterials and nanotechnologies»: the structure and possibility of scientometric studies based on it. Bibliosfera, 2010, 4, 53–60. (In Russ.).Бусыгина Т. В., Елепов Б. С., Зибарева И. В., Лаврик О. Л., Шабурова Н. Н. Исследования Сибирского отделения РАН в области нанонауки и нанотехнологии: библиометрический анализ // Химия в интересах устойчивого развития. 2013. Т. 21, № 4. C. 463–473.Busygina T. V., Elepov B. S., Zibareva I. V., Lavrik O. L., Shaburova N. N. Studies of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences in the field of nanoscience and nanotechnology: bibliometric analysis. Khimiya v interesakh ustoichivogo razvitiya, 2013, 21 (4), 463–473. (In Russ.).Георгиев Г. П. Что губит российскую науку и как с этим бороться. Часть 2 // Троицкий вариант. 2015. № 194. С. 6–7.Georgiev G. P. What destroys the Russian science and how to fight it. Pt. 2. Troitskii variant, 2015, 194, 6–7. (In Russ.).Гуськов А. Е. Российская наукометрия: обзор исследований // Библиосфера. 2015. № 3. С. 75–86.Gus'kov A. E. Russian scientometrics: a review of research. Bibliosfera, 2015, 3, 75–86. (In Russ.).Зибарева И. В., Зибарев А. В., Бузник В. М. Российская нанонаука: библиометрический анализ на основе баз данных STN International // Химия в интересах устойчивого развития. 2010. Т. 18, № 2. С. 215–227.Zibareva I. V., Zibarev A. V., Buznik V. M. Russian nanoscience: bibliometric analysis based on STN International databases. Khimiya v interesakh ustoichivogo razvitiya, 2010, 18 (2), 215–227. (In Russ.).Зибарева И. В. Информационные ресурсы по нанонауке, нанотехнологии и наноматериалам (обзор) // Научнотехническая информация. Серия 1. Организация и методика информационной работы. 2015. № 6. С. 9–29.Zibareva I. V. Information resources on nanoscience, nanotechnology and nanomaterials (review). Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1. Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty, 2015, 6, 9–29. (In Russ.).Клебанер В. С., Мирабян Л. М., Терехов А. И. Опыт и проблемы оценки развития нового научного направления // Науковедение. 2000. № 4. С. 106–128.Klebaner V. S., Mirabyan L. M., Terekhov A. I. Experience and problems of assessing the development of a new scientific field. Naukovedenie, 2000, 4, 106–128. (In Russ.).Хульман А. Экономическое развитие нанотехнологий. Обзор индикаторов // Форсайт. 2009. № 1. С. 30–47.Khul'man A. Economic development of nanotechnology: A review of indicators. Forsait, 2009, 1, 30–47. (In Russ.).Bajwa R. S., Yaldram K., Hussain S. S., Ahmed T. Nanotechnology research among some leading OIC member states // Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2012. Vol. 14, № 9. P. 1–10.Bajwa R. S., Yaldram K., Hussain S. S., Ahmed T. Nanotechnology research among some leading OIC member states. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2012, 14 (9), 1–10.Guan J., Ma N. China’s emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: a comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’ // Research Policy. 2007. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 880–886.Guan J., Ma N. China’s emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’. Research Policy, 2007, 36 (6), 880–886.Huang C., Notten A., Rasters N. Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies // Journal of Technology Transfer. 2011. Vol. 36, № 2. P. 145–172.Huang C., Notten A., Rasters N. Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2011, 36 (2), 145–172.Kostoff R. N. China/USA nanotechnology research output comparison – 2011 update // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2012. Vol. 79, № 5. P. 986–990.Kostoff R. N. China/USA nanotechnology research output comparison – 2011 update. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2012, 79 (5), 986–990.Lavrik O. L., Busygina T. V., Shaburova N. N., Zibareva I. V. Nanoscience and nanotechnology in the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: bibliometric analysis and evaluation // Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2015. Vol. 17, № 2. P. 1–11.Lavrik O. L., Busygina T. V., Shaburova N. N., Zibareva, I. V. Nanoscience and nanotechnology in the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: bibliometric analysis and evaluation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2015, 17 (2), 1–11.Leydesdorff L., Wagner C. S., Bornmann L. The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: competition and collaborations // Journal of Informetrics. 2014. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 606–617.Leydesdorff L., Wagner C. S., Bornmann L. The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: competition and collaborations. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8 (3), 606–617.Terekhov A. I. R&D on carbon nanostructures in Russia: scientometric analysis, 1990–2011 // Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2015. Vol. 17, № 2. P. 1–26.Terekhov A. I. R&D on carbon nanostructures in Russia: scientometric analysis, 1990–2011. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2015, 17 (2), 1–26.Terekhov A. I. Evaluating the performance of Russia in the research in nanotechnology // Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2012. Vol. 14, № 11. P. 1250–1267.Terekhov A. I. Evaluating the performance of Russia in the research in nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2012, 14 (11), 1250–1267.The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology : rep. to the president a. congr. on the 5th assessment of nat. nanotechnology initiative. Washington, 2014. 88 p. URL: www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_fifth_nni_review_oct2014_final.pdf (accessed 22.07.2016).The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology: rep. to the president a. congr. on the 5th assessment of nat. nanotechnology initiative. Washington, 2014. 88 p. URL: www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_fifth_nni_review_oct2014_final.pdf (accessed 22.07.2016).Tijssen R. J. W., Visser M. S., Van Leeuwen T. N. Benchmarking international scientific excellence: are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? // Scientometrics. 2002. Vol. 54, № 3. P. 381–397.Tijssen R. J. W., Visser M. S., Van Leeuwen T. N. Benchmarking international scientific excellence: are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics, 2002, 54 (3), 381–397.Youtie J., Shapira P., Porter A. L. Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocks // Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2008. Vol. 10, № 6. P. 981–986.Youtie J., Shapira P., Porter A. L. Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocks. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2008, 10 (6), 981–986.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.