References

bibliosfera

Библиосфера

Bibliosphere

1815-31862712-7931

ГПНТБ СО РАН

bibliosfera-573

Research Article

ОБЗОРЫ

OVERVIEWS

VOX SCIENTIARI, или УЧЕНЫЕ РАЗНЫХ СТРАН ОБ ЭЛЕКТРОННЫХ РЕСУРСАХ: Опыт проведения социологических исследований

Лакизо

И. Г.

1440@list.ru

Отделение Государственной публичной научно-технической библиотеки Сибирского отделения Российской академии наукRussian Federation

2012

20032012

017787

2012

Лакизо И.Г.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://www.bibliosphere.ru/jour/article/view/573

Анализируется опыт зарубежных стран по изучению использования электронных ресурсов в науке. Показано, что изучение использования электронных ресурсов социологическими методами выделяется в отдельное направление библиотековедческих исследований. Выделены основные этапы развития данного направления исследований. Представлена классификация опросов по масштабу. Приведены данные о результатах наиболее значимых исследований.

The author analyses the experience of foreign countries on studying the use of electronic resources in science. It is shown that the study of the use of electronic resources by sociological methods is separated in a special direction in library science research. Highlighted are the main stages of this direction of research. The classification of surveys according to their scale is given, as well as the results of the most important researches.

социологические опросыэлектронные ресурсынаучное сообщество

opinion pollselectronic resourcesscientific community

References1

Global faculty e-book survey. - URL: http://site. ebrary.com/lib/librarycenter/docDetail.action?docID=80000724 (дата обращения: 20.07.2011).

A Forward Looking Library Use Survey: WSU Libraries in the 21st Century / A. F. Bancroft [et al.] // The J. of Acad. Librarianship. - 1998. - Vol. 24. - P. 216-224.

A User-oriented evaluation of digital libraries: Case study of 'Electronic Journals' service of the library and Information service of the University of Patras, Greece / M. Monopoli [et al.] // ASLIB Proc. - 2002. - Vol. 54. - P. 103-117.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Electronic Journals: Business School Faculty views / S. E. Hahn [et al.] // J. of Business & Finance Librarianship. - 1999. - Vol. 5, N 1. - P. 19-33.

Ajayi N. A. Utilization of electronic databases for diagnostic information among Medical Laboratory Scientists // J. of Hospital Librarianship. - 2007. - Vol. 7, N 1. - P. 43-51.

An evaluation of the second survey on electronic databases usage at Ankara University Digital Library / C. Atakan [et al.] // Electronic Libr. - 2008. - Vol. 26, N 2. - P. 249-259.

Anuradha K. T., Usha H. S. Use of e-books in an academic and research environment. A case study from the Indian Institute of Science // Program-Electronic Libr. a. Inform. Systems. - 2006. - Vol. 40, N 1. - P. 48-62.

Bar-Ilan J., Peritz B. C., Wolman Y. A survey on the use of electronic databases and electronic journals accessed through the web by the academic staff of Israeli universities // The J. of Acad. Librarianship. - 2003. - Vol. 29, N 6. - P. 346-361.

Bennett L., Landoni M. E-books in academic libraries // Electronic Libr. - 2005. - Vol. 23, N 1. - P. 9-16.

Brown B., Found C., McConnell M. Federal Science eLibrary Pilot: Seamless, equitable desktop access for Canadian government researchers // Electronic Libr. - 2007. - Vol. 25, N 1. - P. 8-17.

Coonin B. Open access publishing in business research: the authors' perspective // J. of Business & Finance Librarianship. - 2011. - Vol. 16, N 3. - P. 193-212.

Culture of open access in the University of Kashmir: a researcher's viewpoint / S. Gul [et al.] // ASLIB Proc. - 2010. - Vol. 62, N 2. - P. 210-222.

Dilek-Kayaoglu H. Use of electronic journals by faculty at Istanbul University, Turkey: the results of a survey // J. of Acad. Librarianship. - 2008. - Vol. 34, N 3. - P. 239-247.

Dillon I. F., Hahn K. L. Are researchers ready for the electronic only journal collection? - results of a survey at the University of Maryland // Portal: libraries and the Academy. - 2002. - Vol. 2. - P. 375-390.

eBooks - The End User Perspective : White paper / [Springer]. 8 p. - URL: http://www.springer.com/cda/ content/document/cda_downloaddocument/eBooks+-+the +End+User+Experience?SGWID=0-0-45-608298-0 (дата обращения: 20.07.2011).

E-journals: their use, value and impact : A Research Information Network report. - 2009. - 52 p. - URL: www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/E-journals-report. pdf (дата обращения: 20.07.2011).

E-journals: their use, value and impact: final report / Research Information Network. - 2011. - 32 p. - URL: http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Ejournals_part_II_for_screen_0.pdf (дата обращения: 20.07.2011).

Estelle L., Woodward H. The National E-Books Observatory Project: examining student behaviors and usage // J. of Electronic Resources Librarianship. - 2009. - Vol. 21, N 2. - P. 172-177.

Final synthesis report of the E-journal user study / Institute for the Future. - 2002. - URL: http://ejust.stanford. edu/SR-786.ejustfinal.pdf (дата обращения: 20.07.2011).

Foote J. B., Rupp-Serrano K. Exploring E-book usage among faculty and graduate students in the geosciences: results of a small survey and focus group approach // Science & Technology Libr. - 2010. - Vol. 29, N 3. - P. 216-234.

Fosmire M., Young E. Free scholarly electronic journals: What access do college and university libraries provide? // College & Research Libraries. - 2000. - V. 61, N 6. - P. 500-508.

Heting Chu. Electronic books: viewpoints from users and potential users // Libr. Hi Tech. - 2003. - Vol. 21, N 3. - P. 340-346.

Holmquist J. E. Survey on the use of electronic journals at Princeton (1997) // Library and information services in astronomy III (LISA III) : proceedings of a conference held in Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain, 21-24 April 1998 / ed. Uta Grothkopf. [et al.]. - San Francisco : Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 1998. - P. 166-179.

Hurd J. M., Weiler A. C. From Print to Electronic // Science & Technology Libr. - 1998. - Vol. 6, N 3-4. - P. 147-170.

Jackson M. What Faculty Think: A Survey on Electronic Resources // J. Electronic Resources Librarianship. - 2008. - Vol. 20, N 2. - P. 110-116.

Jamali H. R., Nicholas D., Rowlands I. Scholarly e-books: the views of 16,000 academics results from the JISC National E-Book Observatory // ASLIB Proc. - 2009. - Vol. 61, N 1. - P. 33-47.

Keller A. Future development of electronic journals: a Delphi survey // Electronic Libr. - 2001. - Vol. 19, N 6. - P. 383-396.

Keller A., Neubauer W. Electronic library services - a user study of the ETH Zurich // NFD Information-Wissenschaft und Praxis. - 1999. - Bd 50, N 7. - S. 407-412.

Kumar B. T. S., Kumar G. T. Perception and usage of e-resources and the internet by Indian academics // Electronic Libr. - 2010. - Vol. 28, N 1. - P. 137-156.

Lee W. M., Sinn R. N. Scientists and the journal article: choices for access // J. Interlibr. Loan, Document Delivery & Inform. Supply. - 2002. - Vol. 12, N 3. - P. 37-56.

Lercher A. A. Survey of attitudes about digital repositories among faculty at Louisiana State University at Baton Rouge // J. Acad. Librarianship. - 2008. - Vol. 34, N 5. - P. 408-415.

Levine-Clark M. Electronic book usage: a survey at the University of Denver // Portal: Libraries and the Academy. - 2006. - Vol. 6, N 3. - P. 285-299.

Madhusudhan M. Use of electronic resources by research scholars of Kurukshetra University // Electronic Libr. - 2010. - Vol. 28, N 4. - P. 492-506.

McKiel A. Faculty Experiences with Electronic Resources // The Acquisitions Librarian. - 2008. - Vol. 19, N 3-4. - P. 247-297.

McKiel A. Survey Analysis: ebrary User Survey // The Acquisitions Librarian. - 2008. - Vol. 19, N 3-4. - P. 231-245.

McLuckie A. E-books in an academic library: implementation at the ETH Library, Zurich // Electronic Library. - 2005. - Vol. 23, N 1. - P. 92-102.

Mehta U., Young V. E. Use of Electronic Information Resources // Science & Technology Librs. - 1996. - Vol. 15, N 3. - P. 43-54.

Mullarkey M. ebrary and Two International E-book Surveys // The Acquisitions Librarian. - 2007. - Vol. 19, N 3-4. - P. 213-230.

Neiman Library of Exact sciences & Engineering eBooks Survey. - 2010. - 13 p. - URL: http://blog.tau.ac.il/ libraries/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/the-Neiman-Library- eBooks-survey.pdf (дата обращения: 20.07.2011).

Renner R.A. eBooks - Costs and Benefits to Academic and Research Libraries. - URL: http://www.springer. com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/eBook+White+Paper.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-415198-0 (дата обращения: 20.07.2011).

Riahinia N., Azimi A. Women and the web: an evaluation of academic Iranian women's use of the internet in Tarbiat Moalem University // Electronic Libr. - 2008. - Vol. 26, N 1. - P. 75-82.

Rogers S. Survey and analysis of electronic journal licenses for long-term access provisions in Tertiary New Zealand academic libraries // Serials Rev. - 2009. - Vol. 35, N 1. - P. 3-15.

Rogers S. A. Electronic journal usage at Ohio State University // College & Research Libr. - 2001. - Vol. 62. - P. 25-34.

Rowlands I., Nicholas D. Scholarly communication in the digital environment: the 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes // ASLIB Proc. - 2005. - Vol. 57, N 6. - P. 481-497.

Rusch-Feja D., Siebeky U. Evaluation of usage and acceptance of electronic journals. Results of an electronic survey of Max Planck Society researchers including usage statistics from Elsevier, Springer and Academic Press // D-Lib Magazine. - 1999. - Vol. 5, N 9. - URL: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-summary.html (дата обращения: 20.07.2011).

Shelburn W. A. E-book usage in an academic librariy: User attitudes and behaviors // Library collections, Acquisitions & Technical Servises. - 2009. - Vol.33. - P. 59-72.

Siddiqui M. A. The use of information technology in academic libraries in Saudi Arabia // J. Librarianship a. Inform. Science. - 1997. - Vol. 29, N 4. - P. 195-203.

Smart P. E-journals: developing country access survey // Learned Pub. - 2003. - Vol. 16, N 2. - P. 143-148.

Smith E. T. Changes in faculty reading behaviors: the impact of electronic journals on the University of Georgia // J. Acad. Librarianship. - 2003. - Vol. 29, N 3. - P. 162-168.

Srivastava S., Taglienti P. E-journal management: an online survey evaluation // Serials Rev. - 2005. - Vol. 31, N 1. - P. 28-38.

Sujatha H. R., Murthy H. S. End-user training on the utilization of electronic information sources in fisheries sciences institutions in South India // Electronic Libr. - 2010. - Vol. 28, N 5. - P. 741-754.

Tahir M., Mahmood K., Shafique F. Use of electronic information resources and facilities by humanities scholars // Electronic Libr. - 2010. - Vol. 28, N 1. - P. 122-136.

Tenner E., Yang Z. Y. End-user acceptance of electronic journals: a case study from a major academic research library // Technic. Services Quart. - 2000. - Vol. 17, N 2. - P. 1-14.

The use of online digital resources and educational digital libraries in higher education / F. McMartin [et al.] // International Journal of Digital Libraries. - 2008. - Vol. 9, N 1. - P. 65-79.

Tomney H., Burton P. F. Electronic journals a study of usage and attitudes among academics // J. Inform. Science. - 1998. - Vol. 24. - P. 419-429.

UK scholarly e-book usage: a landmark survey / Nicholas D. [et al.] // ASLIB Proceedings. - 2008. - Vol. 60, N 4. - P. 311-334.

Use and users of electronic journals at Catalan Universities: the results of a survey / À. Borrego [et al.] // J. Acad. Librarianship. - 2007. - Vol. 33, N 1. - P. 67-75.

Voorbij H., Ongering H. The Use of electronic journals by dutch researchers: a descriptive and exploratory study // J. Acad. Librarianship. - 2006. - Vol. 32, N 3. - P. 223-237.

What do faculty and students really think about e-books? / I. Rowlands [et al.] // ASLIB Proc. - 2007. - Vol. 59, N 6. - P. 489-511.

Zainab A. N., Huzaimah A. R., Ang T. F. Using journal use study feedback to improve accessibility // Electronic Libr. - 2007. - Vol. 25, N 5. - P. 558-564.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.