Library science knowledge: continuity and dynamics

Continuity of knowledge is the objective regularity of library science development. Library science is characterized by non- cumulated model of cognitive potential growth. The processes of new knowledge generation, actualization and complementation go on continuously, although unevenly, with varying degrees of intensity at different historical stages. The goal of the article is rationale for continuity and dynamics as the main instruments of library science knowledge development. The article is based on data analyses (including content-analyses) in the framework of methodology of inductive approach. Traditions and innovations are the main categories that provide continuality and dynamics in library knowledge growth and its further enhancement. The author considers the ideological impact on library science development, shows the influence of political changes on library science and the professional community. The article gives examples of Marxist ideology blocking the creation of new scientific ideas, determining the nature and content of research programs and the methodological tools chosen by scientists. Continuity in science can be strengthen by organization and fulfilling microhistorical researches. Portraits can creates a good basis for biographical and prosopographic research. Portraits of researchers presented in scientific, popular science, memoirs and other texts give an idea not only about their lives, but also about the features of the historical era. The role of creating portraits, as well as biographical and prosopographical research, is very important for understanding the processes of dynamics and continuity in the development of library science knowledge. Studying the professional career of practitioners and researchers allows getting answers to questions related to the origins of ideas, concepts, and theories, and helps tracing the complex path of transition from practical activities to library science. These types of research help to identify the social background of researchers, understand their beliefs and motivation to improve practice based on the use of scientific knowledge. Biographical and prosopographical research contributes to the removal of many misconceptions on the development of library science at different historical stages. Local history research is also important for studying and understanding the development of library science and the features of professional and personal life of researchers who have contributed to its cognitive enrichment. The integration of the results of local history, biographical and prosopographical research allows the creation a more complete picture of the development of library science in the historical perspective.

history of library science, library science continuity, discontinuity in library science development, library science dynamics, microhistorical approach, biographical research, prosopographical research, local history studies

1. Akilina MI and Dvorkina MYa (2019) Librarian, head, scientist (to the 90th anniversary of E. A. Fenelonov). Bibliotekovedenie 68(3): 276–281. (In Russ.).

2. Alekseev VP (2017) Power. Philosophy. Science. Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russ.).

3. Babosov EM (2015) Human dimension of social systems. Minsk: Belarus Science. (In Russ.).

4. Borodina VA (2007) Reading personality development: theoretical and methodological aspects: dissertation. Saint Petersburg. (In Russ.).

5. Vaneev AN (1990) “Theoretical discussion” of the early 1930s and its influence on the fate of domestic library scholars. Istoriya bibliotek: issledovaniya, materialy, dokumenty. Saint Petersburg iss. 2, pp. 115–139. (In Russ.).

6. Vaneev AN (2004) Library science. Theory. Methodology. Practice. Saint Petersburg: Professiya. (In Russ.).

7. Vaneev AN (2012) History of librarianship and library science. Saint Petersburg: Russ. Nat. Libr. (In Russ.).

8. Vaneev AN (2008) On the methodological base of library research. Bibliosfera 4: 3–6. (In Russ.).

9. Vaneev AN (1980) Development of library science thought in the USSR. Moscow: Kniga. (In Russ.).

10. Varganova GV (2019) Knowledge that overcame the era. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 4: 131–139. (In Russ.).

11. Varganova GV (2018) Scientific research in the library and information sphere: domestic and foreign practices. Saint Petersburg: St.-Petersb. Inst. of Arts. (In Russ.).

12. Varganova GV, Mikheeva GV and Elyashevich DA (2019) Library of the besieged city. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersb. Inst. of Arts. (In Russ.).

13. Vernadsky V (1988) Works on the general history of science. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).

14. Gendina NI and Kolkova NI (2008) And the heat of inspiration, and creativity strength: about a teacher with grateful memory and love. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i isskustv 4: 3–7. (In Russ.).

15. Glazkov MN (2001) Purges of mass library funds during the years of Soviet power (October 1917–1939). Moscow: Pashkov dom. (In Russ.).

16. Dvorkina MYa (1994) From ideology to the philosophy of librarianship. Bibliotekovedenie 2: 51–53. (In Russ.).

17. Dvorkina MYa (2015) Theory and history of librarianship. Pt. 2. History of librarianship. Moscow: Russ. State Libr. (In Russ.).

18. Karatygina TF (2015) Shine, and it will be light. Professional studios. Moscow: Econ-Inform. (In Russ.).

19. Kasavin IT (2016) Social philosophy of science and collective epistemology. Moscow: Ves’ mir. (In Russ.).

20. Klyuyev VK (2020) Everything begins with the Teacher... On the 100th anniversary of the birth of K. I. Abramov. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 8: 139–146. (In Russ.).

21. Kozhevnikova LA (2014) Library science schools: methods of analysis and diagnostics. Bibliosfera 1: 22–25. (In Russ.).

22. Lavrik OL (2017) Portrait of a scientist in publications: in memory of Boris Stepanovich Elepov. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 1: 58–65. (In Russ.).

23. Lazarevich AA (2015) The formation of the information society: communicationepistemological and cultural-civilizational foundations. Minsk: Belarus Science. (In Russ.).

24. Leonov VP and Sokolov AV (2009) I love... What about otherwise? (Anniversary dialogue about G. V. Gedrimovich). Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 3: 124–131. (In Russ.).

25. Mikheeva GV and Firsov VR (2014) A man beyond the control of time. Bibliotechnoe delo 23: 17–18. (In Russ.).

26. Borodina VA and Borodin SM (2014) Rubakin Nikolai Alexandrovich: chrestomathy. Moscow: Russ. School of Libr. Assoc. (In Russ.).

27. Slanimsky CS (1993) Subject of creative knowledge. Minsk: Publ. House of Acad. of Sciences of Belarus. (In Russ.).

28. Stolyarov YuN (2017) Comrade Rubakin – a Soviet personal pensioner. A stroke to the biography of the great library scholar and enlightener. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 4: 94–104. (In Russ.).

29. Sukiasyan ER (2017) On Alexandra Kumanova’s personality and work. Bibliografiya 1: 121–130. (In Russ.).

30. Tytarenko LG (2016) STP and technocratism as problems of scientific research. Sovremennyi sotsium v mire global’nykh peremen. Minsk, pp. 134–142. (In Russ.).

31. Schreiberg YaL (2019) N. S. Zemskov’s contribution to the development of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 1: 119–120. (In Russ.).