Navigator on the Digital Space of Scientific Knowledge of the Ural Region: Concept and Structure
https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2024-4-32-42
Abstract
One of the key areas of the state policy in the field of scientific and technological development of the country is to create an infrastructure and conditions for conducting research and implementing high-tech technologies. Special attention is given to the development of the scientific and information sphere. The research aims to study the implemented approaches to developing the scientific and information sphere and creation of concept and structure for the navigator on digital scientific and information space of the Ural region. The article analyzes the development of the scientific information sphere in the context of digital transformation. Based on the results obtained, the concept for forming the structure of the digital scientific and information space of the Ural region is developed. The most suitable format for the reference system – a navigator – was chosen as the basis. The analysis and evaluation of existing solutions in the field of formation of navigation systems on digital space of scientific knowledge are carried out. Based on the results obtained and formulated in the task concept, a structure of the navigator for scientific infosphere of the Ural region is developed. The developed navigator will provide aggregation, registration, systematization and accessibility of information about scientific institutions of the Ural region and their information resources in digital space. This will contribute to the dissemination and popularization of research and development results conducted by scientists and research teams in the region.
About the Author
A. Yu. Gerasimenko
Central Scientific Library of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gerasimenko Alena Yurievna, Junior Researcher
22/20 Sofia Kovalevskaya st., Yekaterinburg, 620137
References
1. Antopolsky AB (2019) On the development of a Single Russian electronic space of knowledge. Nauchnoe izdanie mezhdunarodnogo urovnya – 2019: strategiya i taktika upravleniya i razvitiya: materialy 8-i Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Moskva, 23–26 apr. 2019 g. Yekaterinburg, pp. 17–29. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24069/konf-23-26-04-2019.02.
2. Antopolsky AB (2021) Language resources and technologies in Russia: state and prospects. (Review). Sotsial’nye novatsii i sotsial’nye nauki 2: 114–131. (In Russ.)]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31249/snsn/2021.02.08.
3. Antopolsky AB and Antonov AM (2018) About the Navigator of information resources on social sciences. Informatsiya i innovatsii 13 (2): 18–24. (In Russ.).
4. Antopolsky AB and Antonov AM (2018) Development of the Catalogue of Russian information resources on science management. Informatsionnye resursy Rossii 6: 2–7. (In Russ.).
5. Antopolsky AB and Efremenko DV (2019) On creation of modern digital infrastructure to store and analyze scientific-technical information. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1, Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty 6: 8–17. (In Russ.).
6. Gerasimenko AYu (2023) Scientific and educational infosphere of the Ural Region in the Common Digital Space of Scientific Knowledge. Trudy GPNTB SO RAN 3: 58–66. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-3-58-66.
7. Zagorulko YuA (2009) An approach to providing multilingual access to systematized knowledge and information resources of a specified subject area. Izvestiya Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta 314 (5): 161–165. (In Russ.).
8. Kalenov NE and Sotnikov AN (2020) The architecture of the Common Digital Space of Scientific Knowledge. Informatsionnye resursy Rossii 5: 5–8. (In Russ.).
9. Kalenov NE and Sotnikov AN (2023) Structure of the Common Digital Space of Scientific Knowledge ontology. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 2, Informatsionnye protsessy i sistemy 7: 20–26. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36535/0548-0027-2023-07-3.
10. Koshkin A (2022) The model of digital transformation of the system of scientific and technical information into an ecosystem digital environment of scientific and technological knowledge. Informatsionnye resursy Rossii 4: 62–71. (In Russ.).
11. Prokofieva YuD (2022) Scientific organization and author profiles as types of the Internet-representation. Trudy GPNTB SO RAN 4: 45–53. (In Russ.)]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2022-4-45-53.
12. Tsvetkova VА, Kalenov NE, Sotnikov AN and Kharybina ТN (2020) The structure of the subspace “microbiology” as part of the Common Digital Space of Scientific Knowledge. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1, Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty 11: 35–40. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36535/0548-0019-2020-11-4.
13. Shraiberg YaL and Moseeva DS (2024) On the creation of a national system of scientific and technical information in the context of increasing digitalization and in new socio-political realities. Nauchnotekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1, Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty 3: 8–13. (In Russ.).
14. Ali M, Loan FA and Mushatq R (2018) Open access scientific digital repositories: an analytical study of the OpenDOAR. IEEE 5th International symposium on emerging trends and technologies in libraries and information services (ETTLIS 2018). Greater Noida, pp. 213–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ETTLIS.2018.8485265.
15. Karadia A and Sahoo J (2021) A comparative study of India and Australia open access repositories in OpenDOAR. IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology 6 (1): 57–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijlsit.2021.013.
16. Kindling M, Pampel H, van de Sandt S [et al.] (2017) The landscape of research data repositories in 2015: a re3data analysis. D-Lib Magazine 23 (3/4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1045/march2017-kindling.
17. Kuri R and Singh M (2020) Indian institutional repositories (IRs) reflected in the Directory of Open Access Repository (DOAR): a case study. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) 4640. URL: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4640 (accessed 22.07.2024).
18. Ma L, Zou D, Liu L [et al.] (2023) Database Commons: a catalog of worldwide biological databases. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics 21 (5): 1054–1058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2022.12.004.
19. Moulaison HL, Dykas F and Gallant K (2015) OpenDOAR repositories and metadata practices. D-Lib Magazine 21 (3/4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1045/march2015-moulaison.
20. Nayak S and Parhi BK (2021) Assessment of open-access institutional repositories of China on Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) 5315. URL: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5315 (accessed 22.07.2024).
21. Pampel H, Weisweiler NL, Strecker D [et al.] (2023) Re3data – indexing the global research data repository landscape since 2012. Scientific Data 10: 571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02462-y.
22. Parabhoi L and Dey S (2019) Open access repositories: a global perspective with a special emphasis on India and China. Library Herald 57 (3): 342–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-2469.2019.00020.4.
23. Pineld S, Salter J, Bath PA [et al.] (2014) Open‐access repositories worldwide, 2005–2012: past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (12): 2404–2421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23131.
24. Strecker D, Axtmann A, Bertelmann R [et al.] (2023) Metadata schema for the description of research data repositories: version 4.0, August 2023. GFZpublic: publication database. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48440/re3.014.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Gerasimenko A.Yu. Navigator on the Digital Space of Scientific Knowledge of the Ural Region: Concept and Structure. Bibliosphere. 2024;(4):32-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2024-4-32-42
Views:
273
Email this article 