Preview

Bibliosphere

Advanced search

Beyond the Boundaries of Reality: False Bibliographic Records and References

https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2024-4-63-70

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of false bibliographic records and links fabricated by a chatbot with generative artificial intelligence. Text generators have become popular due to the ability to save time and automate the content creation process. Using arrays of heterogeneous data, artificial intelligence is able to combine and interpret various sources of information and create new texts based on them. For bibliographic records, which are a special type of text, any paraphrasing becomes disastrous, because elements of a bibliographic record are unique identifiers of a specific information resource. Spreading of fabricated bibliographic records and links to non-existent publications indicates that artificial intelligence is not able to accurately recognize which parts of the text should be considered as bibliographic data, which significantly limits the possibilities of using chatbots in scientific research. Over time, as technology improves, artificial intelligence must learn to identify bibliographic records and process them differently from ordinary text – copy them exactly, not paraphrase them. However, until these problems are resolved, researchers should exercise caution: information obtained via the use of ChatGPT should be verified. The author of the article focuses on the importance of creating preventive measures to prevent the dissemination of unreliable bibliographic records and references, since this can lead to serious failures in the functioning of the bibliographic information system.

About the Author

M. Yu. Neshheret
Russian State Library
Russian Federation

Neshheret Marina Yurievna - Candidate of Pedagogic Sciences, Leading Researcher, Center for Research on the Problems of Library Development in the Information Society

3/5 Vozdvizhenka St., Moscow, 119019



References

1. Berdnikov L (2015) Something about a book parody. Novyi bereg 47. (In Russ.). URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/bereg/2015/47/ nechto-o-knizhnoj-parodii.html (accessed 24.09.2024).

2. Bobrov LK (2022) Reliability of references to scientific publications: where myths and inaccuracies originate. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 5: 47–65. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi. org/10.33186/1027-3689-2022-5-47-65.

3. Gukovskii GA (1999) Russian literature of the 18th century. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.).

4. Zashikhina IM (2023) Scientific article writing: will ChatGPT help? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii 32 (8/9): 24–47. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-8-9-24-47.

5. Carrière J-C and Eco U (2010) Do not expect to get rid of books! Saint Petersburg: Symposium. (In Russ.).

6. Kogan MI and Ivanov SN (2023) “Catch me if you can.” ChatGPT today: an artificial intelligence that can write a scientific paper for us, or is it an imitation game? Vestnik urologii 11 (3): 10–15. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi. org/10.21886/2308-6424-2023-11-3-10-15

7. Medvedev Yu (2023) More than 10 thousand articles were withdrawn from scientific journals in 2023. Rossiiskaya gazeta: internetportal. (In Russ.)]. URL: https://rg.ru/2023/12/17/bolee-10-tysiach-statej-bylo-otozvano-iz-nauchnyhzhurnalov-v-2023-godu.html (дата обращения = accessed 24.09.2024). published 17.12.2023.

8. Stepanov VK, Madzhumder MSh and Begunova DD (2024) Application of the big language model ChatGPT in library and bibliographic activities. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 4: 86–108. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2024-4-86-108.

9. Sysoev PV and Filatov EM (2023) ChatGPT in students’ research: to forbid or to teach? Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki 28 (2): 276–301. (In Russ.).

10. Sharoyan S (2013) Doctoral dissertation with a bad smell. Kommersant’’ Den’gi 12: 21. (In Russ.).

11. Eco U (2017) Vertigo: the cycle of images, concepts, objects. Moscow: Slovo/Slovo. (In Russ.).

12. Athaluri SA, Manthena SV, Kesapragada VSRKM [et al.] (2023) Exploring the boundaries of reality: investigating the phenomenon of artificial intelligence hallucination in scientific writing through ChatGPT references. Cureus 15 (4): e37432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37432.

13. Buchanan J, Hill S and Shapoval O (2023) ChatGPT hallucinates nonexistent citations: evidence from economics. Social Science Research Network (SSRN): research platform. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4632842. Posted 30.11.2023.

14. Currie GM (2023) Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy? Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 53 (5): 719–730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008.

15. Dergaa I, Chamari K, Zmijewski P and Ben Saad H (2023) From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport 40 (2): 615–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623.


Review

For citations:


Neshheret M.Yu. Beyond the Boundaries of Reality: False Bibliographic Records and References. Bibliosphere. 2024;(4):63-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2024-4-63-70

Views: 564


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1815-3186 (Print)
ISSN 2712-7931 (Online)