Preview

Bibliosphere

Advanced search

N. M. Sikorsky, A. I. Barsuk, I. E. Barenbaum and the Evolvement of Russian Theoretical Book Studies in the Late Soviet Period

https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2025-1-7-18

Abstract

The article presents the results of the study of the scientific heritage of Soviet bibliologists N. M. Sikorsky, A. I. Barsuk, I. E. Barenbaum. The authors analyze and characterize the contribution of each of them to the formation and development of the functional approach in book science. The article identifies and discloses some methodological problems of the functional approach: isolation exclusively in the system of university science, isolation from the international scientific discourse, the presence of intellectual influence of ideologized works of the 1920–1930s (N. Ya. Marr, I. V. Novosadsky, P. N. Berkov), excessive attention to complexity as a key characteristic of the book science, the unresolved issue of scientific methods of bibliological research. It highlights positive and promising areas of development of the functional school– reactualization of the creative heritage of A. M. Lovyagin and M. N. Kufaev, incorporation of the reader and reading into the system of scientific problems of book science, recognition of the communicative essence of book science and the sociodynamics of the book process. In conclusion, the authors substantiate the thesis, that the eclecticism and contradictory nature of late Soviet theoretical book studies and, at the same time, its heuristic value both from the point of view of ensuring the conceptual continuity of the development of book science in our country and in the context of the fruitful academic discussion unfolded in the professional press in the 1970–1980s.

About the Authors

D. A. Elyashevich
Saint-Petersburg State Institute of Culture
Russian Federation

Elyashevich Dmitry Arkadievich, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Head of the Medialogy and Literature Department

Dvortsovaja naberezhnaja, 2-4 Saint-Petersburg, 191186



V. A. Mutev
Saint-Petersburg State Institute of Culture
Russian Federation

Mutev Viktor Alekseevich, Candidate of pedagogic sciences, vice-rector for scientific and creative activities, associate professor of the medialogy and literature department

Dvortsovaja naberezhnaja, 2-4 Saint-Petersburg, 191186

 



References

1. Bazanov PN (2021) The historian of the book and book business I. E. Barenbaum (on the 100th anniversary of his birth). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury 1: 164–172. (In Russ.).

2. Bakun DN (2019) Actualization of book culture heritage (on the anniversary of N. M. Sikorsky). Berkovskie chteniya – 2019. Knizhnaya kul’tura v kontekste mezhdunarodnykh kontaktov: materialy V Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (Pinsk, 29–30 maya 2019 g.). Moscow, pp. 28–36. (In Russ.).

3. DN (2008) N. M. Sikorsky and the development of book science. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).

4. Barenbaum IE (1989) Abram Ilyich Barsuk as a bibliologist and bibliographer. Kniga. Issledovanie i materialy. Moscow, iss. 57, pp. 134–143. (In Russ.).

5. Barenbaum IE (1973) Mikhail Nikolaevich Kufaev (1888–1948). Kniga. Issledovanie i materialy. Moscow, iss. 27, pp. 189–195. (In Russ.).

6. Barenbaum IE (2023) Problems of the theory and methodology of bibliology: coll. of sel. works. Saint Petersburg: S.-Peterb. gos. in-t kul’tury. (In Russ.).

7. Barenbaum IE, Kreidenko VS and Leonov VP (1982) General scientific and special methods of book science, library science, bibliography and information science. Trudy Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury. Saint Petersburg, vol. 68, pp. 47–69. (In Russ.).

8. Briskman MA and Eikhengol’ts AD (eds) (1969) Bibliography. General course. Moscow: Kniga. (In Russ.).

9. Varganova GV (2018) Scientific research in the library and information sphere: domestic and foreign practices. Saint Petersburg: S.-Peterb. gos. in-t kul’tury. (In Russ.).

10. Vokhrysheva MG (1993) Bibliography in the system of culture. Samara. (In Russ.).

11. Guchinsky MG (2000) Academician N. Ya. Marr’s hypothesis on the origin and evolution of the book. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury. Saint Petersburg, vol. 151, pp. 23–28. (In Russ.).

12. Ermolaeva MA (2019) N. M. Sikorsky and bibliological forums. Rumyantsevskie chteniya – 2019: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Moscow, pt. 3, pp. 332–341. (In Russ.).

13. Kalinina IV (2011) N. Ya. Marr and humanitarian knowledge. Observatoriya kul’tury 2: 108–115. (In Russ.).

14. Fursenko LI (comp.) (2014) The book. Research and materials. 100 collections: ref. materials, content ind. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).

15. Kozlov SV and Lizunova IV (2024) On the medialogical understanding of the concept of “book culture”. Bibliosfera 1: 65–75. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2024-1-65-75

16. Kufaev MN (1981) Selected works on bibliology. Moscow: Kniga. (In Russ.).

17. Lavrik OL and Kalyuzhnaya TA (2022) Research support as one of the activities of a scientific library. Bibliosfera 1: 68–79. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2022-1-68-79

18. Lelikova NK (2004) Formation and development of bibliological and bibliographic sciences in Russia in the 19th – first third of the 20th century. Saint Petersburg: Ros. nats. b-ka. (In Russ.).

19. Lovyagin AM (1926) Fundamentals of bibliological studies. Leningrad: Nachatki znanii. (In Russ.).

20. Lyublinsky VS (1972) Book in the history of human society. Moscow: Kniga. (In Russ.).

21. McLuhan M (2007) Understanding media: the extensions of man. 2nd ed. Moscow: Giperboreya, Kuchkovo pole. (In Russ.).

22. Marr NYa (1934) Selected works. Vol. 3. Language and society. Moscow: Gos. sots.-ekon. izd-vo. (In Russ.).

23. Migon’ K (1991) Book science: an essay on the problems. Moscow: Kniga. (In Russ.).

24. Mutev VA and Turgaev AS (2024) M. N. Kufaev’s framework of the book science: directions of actualization in modern science. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury 1: 172–178. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30725/2619-0303-2024-1-172-178

25. Mutev VA, Turgaev AS and Shukshin SI (2024) Development of the communication paradigm of book science in the scientific work of M. N. Kufaev. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury 2: 151–157. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30725/2619-0303-2024-2-151-157

26. Novosadsky IV (1931) Against bourgeois theories in Soviet book studies. Krasnyi bibliotekar’ 10: 18–26. (In Russ.).

27. (1965) Discussion of pressing problems of Soviet book studies. Kniga. Issledovanie i materialy. Moscow, iss. 11, pp. 270–290. (In Russ.).

28. Nemirovsky EL (ed.) (1978) Problems of the general theory of bibliology: coll. of articles. Moscow: Kniga. (In Russ.).

29. Redkina NS (2016) Modeling as a method of scientific cognition in library science. Novosibirsk: GPNTB SO RAN. (In Russ.).

30. Sidorov AA (1972) Book and life: coll. of bibliol. works. Moscow: Kniga. (In Russ.).

31. Sikorsky NM (1979) Book. Reader. Library: coll. of bibliol. works. Moscow: Kniga. (In Russ.).

32. Slyadneva NA (1993) Bibliography in the system of the Universe of human activity: an experience of system-activity analysis. Moscow: Izd-vo MGIK. (In Russ.).

33. Fokeev VA (1995) The nature of bibliographic knowledge. Moscow. (In Russ.).

34. Fokeev VA (1998) The fate and credo of a bibliographer (A. I. Barsuk). Bibliografiya 6: 83–88. (In Russ.).

35. Chervinsky M and Zbersky T (1981) Book system. Semiotics of the book. Moscow: Kniga. (In Russ.).

36. Elyashevich DA (2020) Iosif Evseevich Barenbaum – bibliologist: on the 100th anniversary of his birth. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury. Saint Petersburg, vol. 220, pp. 7–16. (In Russ.).

37. Elyashevich DA (2018) Bibliology: life after death. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury. Saint Petersburg, vol. 217, pp. 55–81. (In Russ.).

38. Elyashevich DA (2021) «Renaissance of bibliology», book studies and more. Potentsial biblioteki v sovremennom mire: transformatsii, perspektivy: materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem. Samara, pp. 117–126. (In Russ.).

39. Elyashevich DA (2024) Reading and the reader as objects of study. Kniga. Chtenie. Mediasreda 2 (1): 40–44. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/BRM-2-1-4

40. Elyashevich DA and Ikonnikova IYu (2024) Heritage in the field of book history of the teachers of the Department of General Bibliography and Bibliology of the Leningrad State University of Culture named after N. K. Krupskaya. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury 3: 162–168. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30725/2619-0303-2024-3-162-168

41. Elyashevich DA and Mutev VA (2022) Master’s textbook on book studies: basic problems and prospects of preparation. Bibliosfera 3: 5–16. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2022-3-5-16

42. Elyashevich DA and Mutev VA (2021) New book science: a look into the future. Bibliosfera 1: 43–53. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2021-1-43-53

43. Eisenstein EL (1979) The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early modern Europe. In 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

44. Maceviciute E and Janonis O (2004) Conceptions of bibliography in the Russian Federation: The Russian phenomenon of bibliographic theory. Libri: International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies 54 (1): 30–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/LIBR.2004.30


Review

For citations:


Elyashevich D.A., Mutev V.A. N. M. Sikorsky, A. I. Barsuk, I. E. Barenbaum and the Evolvement of Russian Theoretical Book Studies in the Late Soviet Period. Bibliosphere. 2025;(1):7-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2025-1-7-18

Views: 198


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1815-3186 (Print)
ISSN 2712-7931 (Online)