The matrix of tasks, resources and competences for research libraries

The lag of Russia in the development of the fifth technological order has had a dramatic impact on research and technological libraries. Until the early 1990s, they were rightfully considered unique access points to relevant scientific knowledge, and now they are experiencing an acute crisis, looking for their place in the radically changed landscape of scholarly communications

The article identifies the main challenges that led to the crisis. The aim of the study is to find answers to these challenges, namely: new tasks that libraries can take on and that will be in demand by the scientific community. However, their solution is possible only after mastering new competencies and providing necessary resources. To systematize this picture, a matrix of tasks, resources and competencies is constructed.

1. Gus’kov A. E., Kalenov N. E., Treskova P. P. The concept of a three-level system to subscibe scientific information resources. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty, 2017, 9, 22–26. (In Russ).

2. Guskov A. E., Kosyakov D. V., Lavrik O. L., Red’kina N. S., Makeeva O. V. Research library – 2030. Trudy GPNTB SO RAN. Novosibirsk, 2018, 13(1), 9–29. DOI: 10.20913/2618-7575-2018-1-9-29. (In Russ).

3. Kalenov N. E., Tsvetkova V. A. New challenges in library and information space: modern personnel – a care of libraries themselves. Bibliotekovedenie, 2017, 66, 5, 587–591. DOI: 10.25281/0869-608X-2017-66-5-587-591. (In Russ).

4. Kosyakov D. V. New digital technologies: challenges and risks for libraries. Trudy GPNTB SO RAN. Novosibirsk, 2018, 13(2), 97–104. DOI: 10.20913/2618-7515-2018-2-97-104 (In Russ).

5. Lavrik O. L., Kalyuzhnaya T. A., Pleshakova M. A. Systematic review as a type of review and analytical products. Bibliosfera. 2019, 2, 33–51. DOI: 10.20913/1815-3186-20192-33-51. (In Russ).

6. Lavrik O. L., Kalyuzhnaya T. A., Pleshakova M. A., Yudina I. G., Pavlova L. P., Bazyleva E. A., Fedotova O. A., Vakhrameeva Z. V. Analysis of information needs of specialists and scientists of SB RAS. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty, 2018, 1, 15–25. (In Russ).

7. Lavrik O. L., Pleshakova M. A., Kalyuzhnaya T. A. Information and analytical products in scientific libraries for research information support. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie, 2018, 4, 186–201. DOI: 10.17223/22220836/32/19. (In Russ).

8. Leonov V. P. Future of the library as a subject of study. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki, 2012, 9, 51–68. (In Russ).

9. Kirillova O. V. (ed.) Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po podgotovke i oformleniyu nauchnykh statei v zhurnalakh, indeksiruemykh v mezhdunarodnykh naukometricheskikh bazakh dannykh [Guidelines to prepare and registrate scientific articles in journals indexed in international scientometric databases]. Moscow, 2017. 144 p. (In Russ).

10. Red’kina N. S. Modern trends in research data management. Nauchno-tehnicheskaya informatsija. Seriya 1. Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty, 2019, 4, 1–7. (In Russ).

11. Syuntyurenko O. V., Kalenov N. E., Tsvetkova V. A. Actual problems of modernization of the information support system in the scientific-industrial sphere. Informatsiya i innovatsii, 2019, 13(2), 7–17. DOI: 10.31432/1994-2443-2018-13-2-7-17. (In Russ).

12. Treskova P. P. TsSL URO RAS as the center of science informational support in the Urals. Informatsionnoe obespechenie nauki: novye tekhnologii : sb. nauch. tr. 19-go seminara (Tarusa, 24–28 avg. 2015 g.). Sovetsk, 2015, 18–30.(In Russ). 45

13. Cherinet Y. M. Blended skills and future roles of librarians. Library Management, 2018, 39(1/2), 93–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-02-2017-0015.

14. Franceschini F., Maisano D., Mastrogiacomo L. Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(4), 933–953.

15. Franceschini F., Maisano D., Mastrogiacomo L. The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(1), 174–182.

16. Koltay T. Are you ready? Tasks and roles for academicФ libraries in supporting Research 2.0. New Library World, 2016, 117(1/2), 94–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-092015-0062.

17. Saunders L. Academic libraries’ strategic plans: top trends and under-recognized areas. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2015, 41(3), 285–291. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.011.

18. Valderrama-Zurián J.-C., Aguilar-Moya R., Melero-Fuentes D., Aleixandre-Benavent R. A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics. 2015, 9(3), 570–576.

19. Writer B. Lithium-ion batteries: a machinegenerated summary of current research. Heidelberg, Springer, 2019. 246 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16800-1.