Methods to determine scientific publications citation of a researcher
https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2017-1-103-109
Abstract
The article represents two methods of estimating publication citations based on information-analytical systems «Map of Russian science» (IAS MRS) using analytical tools of this system to evaluate research significance of scientists. These techniques are advisory in nature and exemplified by two researchers, who publish the most actively in journal «Scientific and Technical Libraries». They can only be used for the analysis of citation of verified scientists in IAS MRS. The paper gives a comparison with the IAS Russian Science Citation Index. The advantage of the first technique is obtaining data to study the researcher profile in detail. The bibliometric analysis of an individual approach, in contrast to the comparative approach of the second technique is not directed to get the characteristics of «more, less, equal», but to study bibliographic information about publications obtaining not quantitative but qualitative data.
The comparative-analytical method has a statistical character showing a quantitative picture, which is the information basis for further bibliometric analysis and getting new qualitative results.
About the Author
K. S. BorgoyakovaRussian Federation
Moscow
References
1. De Solla Price D. J. Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and non-science. Communication among scientists and engineers. Lexington, 1970, 3–22.
2. Garfield E., Sher I. H. New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 1963, 14 (3), 195–201.
3. Moed H. F. Bibliometric measurement of research performance and Price's theory of differences among the sciences. Scientometrics, 1989, 15 (5/6), 473–483.
4. Anikeeva O. S. Using the Science Citation Index as a characteristic of the research activities of scientists. Nauka. Innovatsii. Tekhnologii, 2009, 6, 5–11. (In Russ.).
5. Aref'ev P. G., Eremenko G. O., Glukhov V. A. Russian Science Citation Index-based tool for the analysis of science. Bibliosfera, 2012, 5, 66–71. (In Russ.).
6. Bredikhin S. V., Kuznetsov A. Yu., Shcherbakova N. G. Analiz tsitirovaniya v bibliometrii [Analysis of citations in bibliometrics]. Novosibirsk, IVMiMG SO RAN, NEIKON, 2013. 344 p. (In Russ.).
7. Gordukalova G. F. Citation Index in science: the purpose of use, main varieties and limitations. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv, 2014, 2 (19), 54–57. (In Russ.).
8. Gus'kov A. E. Russian scientometrics: a review of research. Bibliosfera, 2015, 3, 75–86. (In Russ.).
9. Efimova G. Z. Analysis of the effectiveness of scientometric indicators in the evaluation of scientific activity. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, 8, 101–108. (In Russ.).
10. Zemskov A. I. About some bibliometric indices. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki, 2016, 8, 18–28. (In Russ.).
11. Kara-Murza S. G. Citation in science and approaches to the evaluation of the scientific contribution. Vestnik Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1981, 5, 68–75. (In Russ.).
12. Mikhailenko I. V., Goncharov M. V. Scientometric indicators used in «Map of the Russian science». Method of calculation. Karta Rossiiskoi nauki. URL: https://mapofscience.ru/content Asset/raw-data/8b73cb5d-146d-4036-b79b-d0e0f4f598c6/fileAsset?byInode=true ( accessed 14.10.2016). (In Russ.).
13. Mokhnacheva Yu. V., Kharybina T. N. Methods of determining the significance of scientific publications. Bibliosfera, 2008, 3, 23–33. (In Russ.).
14. Volegov P. S, Tashkinov M. A., Tsvetova O. D. (eds). Osnovnye bibliometricheskie pokazateli dlya otsenki effektivnosti nauchnoi raboty [Main bibliometric indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of scientific work]. Perm, Perm. nats. issled. un-ta, 2012. 24 p. (In Russ.).
15. Pislyakov V. V. Bibliometricheskie indikatory : praktikum [Bibliometric indicators : guidelines]. Moscow, Infra-M, 2014. 60 p. (In Russ.).
16. Pislyakov V. V. What for are national citation indexes created? Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki. 2007, 2, 65–71. (In Russ.).
17. Pislyakov V. V. Methods to evaluate scientific knowledge in terms of citation. Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 2007, 1, 128–140. (In Russ.).
18. Roshchina N. V. Russian Science Citation Index and the problem of the correct citation in periodicals. Vestnik Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2011, 1, 134–140. (In Russ.).
19. Sverdlov E. D. Citation mirages. Bibliometric evaluation of the significance of scientific publications of individual researchers. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2006, 76 (12), 1073–1085. (In Russ.).
20. Sviryukova V. G. Citation index: different methods, different results. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1. Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty, 2004, 2, 22–25. (In Russ.).
21. Adler R., Eving D., Teilor P. Citation statistics. Igra v tsyfir', ili kak teper' otsenivayut trud uchenogo : (sb. st. o bibliometrike) URL : http://qps.ru/PXAjL (accessed 01.12.16). (In Russ.).
22. Stolyarov Yu. N. On the laws of functioning the documentcommunication system (a reply to an article by A. V. Sokolov). Vestnik Chelyabinskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii kul'tury i iskusstv. 2009, 2, 15–22. (In Russ.).
23. Sukiasyan E. R. The multifaced «informatics». Classification analysis. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki, 2010, 2, 42–47. (In Russ.).
24. Shtovba S. D., Shtovba E. V. Citation Index, which takes into account the latent diffusion of scientific knowledge. Nauchnotekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1. Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty, 2013, 7, 28–31. (In Russ.).
25. Yan E., Din I. N. Weighted citation: indicator of prestige articles. Mezhdunarodnyi forum po informatsii, 2011, 36 (2), 19–27. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Borgoyakova K.S. Methods to determine scientific publications citation of a researcher. Bibliosphere. 2017;(1):103-109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2017-1-103-109