Preview

Bibliosphere

Advanced search

Modern libraries practices for teaching information literacy

https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2019-4-46-53

Abstract

Information literacy as a set of techniques and methods to work with diverse types of information is a necessary condition for s person to exist in the modern world, because it helps to develop personal, professional and educational skills. The concept of information literacy firstly appeared in the United States in the 1970th. It was a response to the development of information society. Up to now the idea has not lost its relevance, due to the intensive growth of information technologies, an increase in information volumes and the emergence of new educational paradigms. Since the 1990th libraries began to actively develop programs and implement methods of increasing information literacy, systematically train users in rational methods of search, analytical and synthetic information processing, extraction, evaluation and transformation, as well as in the grounds of information security. The purpose of this article is to identify current advanced practices of libraries on various training forms to develop users’ information literacy, taking into account the increase in information flows and the emergence of large amounts of misinformation, the expansion of information types, the capabilities of education technologies, including online, library directions of work activities. To get information use was made of the Scopus database (the selection criterion: journal publications from 2015 to 2019 on the topic “information literacy”). The publication analysis has shown that libraries choose various ways and methods to teach information literacy their users: embedding programs in the educational process (academic libraries); through game, interactive forms (public libraries), individual methods of work of subject librarians with readers, as well as online instructions that allow formation of skills for effective search and information processing in any format.

About the Author

N. S. Redkina
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Redkina Natalya Stepanovna, Deputy Director, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences

Novosibirsk



References

1. Gendina N. I. Informatsionnoe obrazovanie i informatsionnaya kul’tura kak faktor bezopasnosti lichnosti v global’nom informatsionnom obshchestve: vozmozhnosti obrazovatel’nykh organizatsii i bibliotek [Information education and information culture as a factor of personal security in the global information society: opportunities of educational organizations and libraries]. Moscow, Litera, 2016. 391 p. (In Russ.).

2. Gendina N. I., Korkonosenko S. G. (eds.) Mediinaya i informatsionnaya gramotnost’: programma obucheniya pedagogov [Media and information literacy: teacher training program]. Moscow, 2012. URL: https://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/ru/files/3214706.pdf (accessed 07.11.2019). (In Russ.).

3. Moskovskaya deklaratsiya o mediai informatsionnoi gramotnosti [Moscow declaration on media and information literacy]. 2012. URL: http://www.ifapcom.ru/ru/news/1347 (accessed 08.08.2019). (In Russ.).

4. Kuz’min E. I. et al. (comps.) Programma YuNESKO “Informatsiya dlya vsekh v Rossii (2000–2010) gg.” ; sb. materialov [UNESCO program “Information for all in Russia (2000–2010)” : collection of materials] URL: http://www.ifapcom.ru/files/publications/ifap_in_russia.pdf (accessed 08.08.2019). (In Russ.).

5. Red’kina N. S. Current trends in research data management. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1. Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty, 2019, 4, 1–7. (In Russ.).

6. Rekomendatsii IFLA po mediinoi i informatsionnoi gramotnosti [IFLA recommendations on media and information literacy]. 2011. URL: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/informationliteracy/publications/media-info-lit-recommend-ru.pdf (accessed 08.08.2019). (In Russ.).

7. Borchardt R., Salcedo T., Bentley M. Little intervention, big results: intentional integration of information literacy into an introductory-level biology lab course. Journal of Biological Education, 2019, 53 (4), 450– 462. DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2018.149429.

8. Dawes L. Faculty perceptions of teaching information literac y to first-year students: a phenomenographic study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2019, 51 (2), 545–560. DOI: 10.1177/0961000617726129.

9. Demasson A., Partridge H., Bruce C. How do public librarians constitute information literacy? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2019, 51 (2), 473– 487. DOI: 10.1177/0961000617726126.

10. Carretero S., Vuorikari R., Punie Y. DigComp 2.1. The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg, 2017. 44 p. URL: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC106281/web-digcomp2.1pdf_(online).pdf (accessed 08.08.2019).

11. DiNardo C. O., Snyder Broussard M. J. Commercial tabletop games to teach information literacy. Reference Services Review, 2019, 47 (2), 106–117. DOI: 10.1108/RSR-10-2018-0066.

12. Donlan R., Stanislaw S., Fernandez M. The future of information literacy in the library: an example of librarian/ publisher collaboration. Serials Librarian, 2017, 72 (1/4), 91–94.

13. ECIL 2018 conference proceedings. European conference on information literacy (Oulu, Finland, Sept. 24–27, 2018). URL: http://ecil2018.ilconf.org/ (accessed 08.08.2019).

14. Fernández-Ramos A. Online information literacy instruction in Mexican university libraries: the librarians’ point of view. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2019, 45 (3), 242–251. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.03.008.

15. Framework for information literacy for higher education. Filed by the ACRL Board on 02.02.2015; adopted 11.01.2016. Chicago, 2016. 36 p. URL: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/issues/infolit/Framework_ILHE.pdf (accessed 08.08.2019).

16. Framework for information literacy for higher education. Association of College and Research Libraries. URL: http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework (accessed 08.08.2019).

17. Lau J. Guidelines on information literacy for lifelong learning. Boca del Río, 2006. 60 p. URL: http://www.ifla.org/VII/s42/pub/IL-Guidelines2006.pdf (accessed 08.08.2019).

18. Spratt H. E., Agosto D. E. Fighting fake news: because we all deserve the truth. Programming ideas for teaching teens media literacy. Young Adult Library Services, 2017, 15 (4), 17–21.

19. How to spot fake news. IFLA. URL: https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11174 (accessed 08.08.2019).

20. Ince S., Hoadley C., Kirschner P. A. The role of libraries in teaching doctoral students to become information-literate researchers: a review of existing practices and recommendations for the future. Information and Learning Science, 2019, 120 (3/4), 158–172. DOI: 10.1108/ILS-07-2018-0058.

21. Information literacy badges at Penn State. Informing and supporting Penn State’s use of digital badges for information literacy skills. Sites at Penn State. URL: https://sites.psu.edu/informationliteracybadges/psuil-badges/ (accessed 08.08.2019).

22. Kiely E., Robertson L. How to spot fake news. FactCheck.org. 2016. URL: https://www.factcheck.org/2016/11/how-to-spot-fake-news/ (accessed 08.08.2019).

23. Matteson M. L., Gersch B. Unique or ubiquitous: information literacy instruction outside academia. Reference Services Review, 2019, 47 (1), 73–84. DOI: 10.1108/RSR-12-2018-0075.

24. Musgrove A. T., Powers J. R., Rebar L. C., Musgrove G. J. Real or fake? Resources for teaching college students how to identify fake news. College and Undergraduate Libraries, 2018, 25 (3), 243–260. DOI: 10.1080/10691316.2018.1480444.

25. Radolovic D. Information literacy as a conceptual outline. 41st International convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics (MIPRO): proceedings. Opatija, 2018, 494–499. DOI: 10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400094.

26. Stopar K., Bartol T. Digital competences, computer skills and information literacy in secondary education: mapping and visualization of trends and concepts. Scientometrics, 2019, 118 (2), 479–498. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2990-5.

27. Teague D. P. Tips for teaching library instruction and information literacy to first-gen college students, non-traditional students, or English as a second language (ESL) students. Serials Review, 2019, 45 (3), 105–110. DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2019.1644699.

28. Utter M. The Library + the Academic Writing Center = A true story how to integrate the Academic writing center in the library. IEEE5th international symposium on emerging trends and technologies in libraries and information services (ETTLIS). Noida, 2018, 96–99. DOI: 10.1109/ETTLIS.2018.8485246.

29. Zakharov W., Maybee C. Bridging the gap: information literacy and learning in online undergraduate courses. Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 2019, 13 (1/2), 215–225. DOI: 10.1080/1533290X.2018.1499256.

30. Ziegler A. Framework + digital badges = online instruction for today. Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 2019, 13 (1/2), 235–241. DOI: 10.1080/1533290X.2018.1499262.


Review

For citations:


Redkina N.S. Modern libraries practices for teaching information literacy. Bibliosphere. 2019;(4):46-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2019-4-46-53

Views: 3704


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1815-3186 (Print)
ISSN 2712-7931 (Online)