Changes of the paradigm of publications search and use by researchers
https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2016-1-59-65
Abstract
The article reviews the most significant changes in searching models and using patterns of readers while working with scientific literature. A shift in the search paradigm and reading models is caused by both common trends of science and technology development, and specific changes in librarianship. Furthermore, an inverse relation is also true, when knowledge on readers’ behavior can be effectively used in acquisition modeling, in providing researchers with scientific information, in revising networks of library access, as well as in improving the editorial policy of academic journals.
About the Authors
V. N. Gureev
Институт нефтегазовой геологии и геофизики им. А. А. Трофимука СО РАН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. A. Mazov
Институт нефтегазовой геологии и геофизики им. А. А. Трофимука СО РАН; Государственная публичная научно-техническая библиотека Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Бойченко Е. Н. Периодические издания по техническим наукам в Интернете: доступность электронных ресурсов // Научные и технические библиотеки. - 2009. - № 5. - C. 31-45.
2. Босина Л. В., Шабурова Н. Н. Анализ уровня удовлетворенности информационных потребностей ученых СО РАН в зарубежных периодических изданиях // Мир науки, культуры, образования. - 2010. - № 3. - C. 88-93.
3. Веселаго В. Г., Елизаров А. М., Синтюренко О. В. Российские электронные научные журналы: новый этап развития, проблемы интеграции // Электронные библиотеки. - 2005. - T. 8, № 1. - C. 12-24.
4. Еременко Г. О. eLIBRARY.RU и РИНЦ в информационной инфраструктуре российской науки : беседа с гендиректором НЭБ Г. Еременко ; вел К. Кокарев // Политические исследования. - 2013. - № 1. - C. 146-154.
5. Земсков А. И., Шрайберг Я. Л. Электронные библиотеки. - М. : Либерея, 2003. - 351 с.
6. Земсков А. И., Шрайберг Я. Л. Электронная информация и электронные ресурсы: публикации и документы, фонды и библиотеки. - М. : ФАИР, 2007. - 528 с.
7. Кузнецов А. Ю., Разумова И. К., Шварцман М. Е. Информационная поддержка науки и образования: российский опыт использования электронных ресурсов // Вестник национального комитета «Интеллектуальные ресурсы России». - 2004. - № 2. - C. 15-20.
8. Разумова И. Кто больше читает, тот больше публикует : интервью // Наука и технологии РФ. - 2011. - URL: http://www.strf.ru/material.aspx?CatalogId=221&d_ no=42023#.U70Ylfl_tZH (дата обращения: 30.01.2015).
9. Терешин В. И. Библиотечный фонд : учеб. пособие. - 2-е, испр. и доп. изд. - М. : МГУКИ, 2000. - 176 с.
10. Эпштейн В. Л. Предвидимое будущее научных журналов // Проблемы управления. - 2004. - № 1. - C. 2-15.
11. Adams J. A., Bonk S. C. Electronic information technologies and resources: Use by university faculty and faculty preferences for related library services // College and Research Libraries. - 1995. - Vol. 56, № 2. - P. 119-131.
12. Bishop A. P. Scholarly journals on the net: a reader’s assessment // Library Trends. - 1995. - Vol. 43, № 4. - P. 544-570.
13. Brookes B. C. The growth, utility and obsolescence of scientific periodical literature // Journal of Documentation. - 1970. - № 26. - P. 283-294.
14. Budd J. M. Faculty publishing productivity: comparisons over time // College and Research Libraries. - 2006. - Vol. 67, № 3. - P. 230-239.
15. Budd J. M., Connaway L. S. University faculty and networked information: results of a survey // Journal of the American Society for Information Science. - 1997. - Vol. 48, № 9. - P. 843-852.
16. Chandrakar R. Digital object identifier system: an overview // Electronic Library. - 2006. - Vol. 24, № 4. - P. 445-452.
17. E-journals: their use, value and impact: a Research Information Network report / Research Information Network. - London, 2009. - 52 p.
18. Ellison G. Is peer review in decline? // Economic Inquiry. - 2011. - Vol. 49, № 3. - P. 635-657.
19. Fry J., Talja S. The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields // Proceedings of the 67th ASIST Annual Meeting. - Medford, 2004. - Vol. 41. - P. 20-30.
20. Gardner T., Inger S. How readers discover content in scholarly journals: comparing the changing user behaviour between 2005 and 2012 and its impact on publisher web site design and function. - Abingdon : Renew Training, 2012. - 123 с.
21. Jurski D. Study of subscription prices for Scholarly Society Journals: society journal pricing trends and industry overview. - [S. l.] : Allen Press, 2013. - 18 с.
22. Kaminer N. Scholars and the use of the internet // Library and Information Science Research. - 1997. - Vol. 19, № 4. - P. 329-345.
23. King D. W., Tenopir C., Choemprayong S., Wu L. Scholarly journal information-seeking and reading patterns of faculty at five US universities // Learned Publishing. - 2009. - Vol. 22, № 2. - P. 126-144.
24. Larsen P. O., Мon Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index // Scientometrics. - 2010. - Sept. - Vol. 84, № 3. - P. 575-603.
25. Lozano G. A., Larivière V., Gingras Y. The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. - 2012. - Vol. 63, № 11. - P. 2140-2145.
26. McClanahan K., Wu L., Tenopir C., King D. W. Embracing change: Perceptions of e-journals by faculty members // Learned Publishing. - 2010. - Vol. 23, № 3. - P. 209-223.
27. Paskin N. The digital object identifier system: Digital technology meets content management // Interlending and Document Supply. - 1999. - Vol. 27. - № 1. - P. 13-16.
28. Rubinstein E. Paradigm Shifts in Information Dissemination - from Print to the Web // Nobel Symposium (NS 120) «Virtual Museums and Public Understanding of Science and Culture» (May 26-29, 2002, Stockholm, Sweden), 2002. - P. 1-17.
29. Stinson E. R., Lancaster F. W. Synchronous versus diachronous methods in the measurement of obsolescence by citation studies // Journal of Information Science. - 1987. - Vol. 13, № 2. - P. 65-74.
30. Talja S., Maula H. Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines // Journal of Documentation. - 2003. - Vol. 59, № 6. - P. 673-691.
31. Tenopir C., King D. W. Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. - Washington : Special Libr. Assoc., 2000. - 488 с.
32. Tenopir C., King D. W. Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns // D-Lib Magazine. - 2008. - Vol. 14, № 11/12. - P. 1-13.
33. Tenopir C., Mays R., Wu L. Journal article growth and reading patterns // New Review of Information Networking. - 2011. - Vol. 16, № 1. - P. 4-22.
34. Tenopir C., King D. W., Edwards S., Wu L. Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns // Aslib Proceedings. - 2009. - Vol. 61, № 1. - P. 5-32.
35. Wang J. Digital Object Identifiers and Their Use in Libraries // Serials Review. - 2007. - Vol. 33, № 3. - P. 161-164.
36. Zhang Y. Scholarly use of Internet-based electronic resources // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. - 2001. - Vol. 52, № 8. - P. 628-654.
Review
For citations:
Gureev V.N., Mazov N.A. Changes of the paradigm of publications search and use by researchers. Bibliosphere. 2016;(1):59-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2016-1-59-65
Views:
902
Email this article 