Статистики цитирования¹ Доклад Международного математического союза (IMU) в сотрудничестве с Международным советом промышленной и прикладной математики (ICIAM) и Институтом математической статистики (IMS).

1. Evidence Report, 2007. The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in the UK higher education system. - URL: http://bookshop.universitiesuk.ac.uk/ downloads/bibliometrics.pdf

2. Martin B. R. The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research // Scientometrics. - 1996. - Vol. 36, N 3. - P. 343-362.

3. Carey A. L., Cowling M. G., Taylor P. G. Assessing research in the mathematical sciences // The Austral. Math. Soc. Gaz. - 2007. - Vol. 34, N 2. - P. 84-89.

4. Garfield E. Agony and the ecstasy - the history and meaning of the journal impact factor : presented at the Intern. congr. on peer review a. bibliomedical publication. Chicago, Sept. 16, 2005. - URL: http://garfield. library.upenn.edu/papers/jifchicago2005.pdf

5. Thomson: selection. - URL: http://scientific.thomson. com/free/essays/selectionofmaterial/journalselection

6. Thomson: impact factor. - URL: http://scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/journalcitationreports/impactfactor

7. Seglen P. O. Why the impact factor for journals should not be used for evaluating research // BMJ. - 1997. - Vol. 314. - P. 497.

8. Amin M., Mabe M. Impact factor: use and abuse // Perspectives in Publishing. - 2000. - N. 1. - P. 1-6.

9. Monastersky R. The number that's devouring science // The Chronicle of Higher Education. - 2005. - Vol. 52, N 8.

10. Ewing J. Measuring journals // Notices of the AMS. - 2006. - Vol. 53, N 9. - P. 1049-1053.

11. Adler R. The impact of impact factors // IMS Bull. - 2007. - Vol. 36, N 5. - P. 4.

12. Hall P. Measuring research performance in the mathematical sciences in Australian universities // The Austral. Math. Soc. Gaz. - 2007. - Vol. 34, N 1. - P. 26-30.

13. Garfield E. Long-term vs. short-term journal impact (part II) // The Scientist. - 1998. - Vol. 12, N 14. - P. 12.

14. Garfield E. Why are the impacts of the leading medical journals so similar and yet so different? // Current Comments. - 1987. - N 2.

15. Stringer M. J., Sales-Pardo M., Nunes Amaral L. A. Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information // PLoS ONE. - 2008. - Vol. 3, N 2. - P. E1683.

16. Hirsch J. E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output // Proc. of the Nat. Acad. of Sciences of the USA. - 2006. - Vol. 102, N 46. - P. 16569-16573.

17. Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index // Scientometrics. - 2006. - Vol. 69, N 1. - P. 131-152.

18. Universal behavior of a research productivity index / P. D. Batista [et al.] : preprint, 2005. - URL: http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0510/0510142.pdf

19. Batista P. D., Campiteli M. G., Kinouchi O. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? // Scientometrics. - 2006. - Vol. 68, N 1. - P. 179-189.

20. Sidiropoulos A., Katsaros D., Manolopoulos Y. Generalized h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Vl : preprint, 2006. - URL: http://delab.csd.auth. gr/papers/LinkKDD06skm.pdf

21. Lehmann S., Jackson A. D., Lautrup B. E. Measures for measures // Nature. - 2006. - Vol. 444, N 21. - P. 1003-1004.

22. Molinari J. F., Molinari A. A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions // Scientometrics. - 2008. - Vol. 75, N 1. - P. 163-174.

23. Kinney A. L. National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research // Proc. of the Nat. Acad. of Sciences of the USA. - 2007. - Vol. 104, N 46. - P. 17943-17947.

24. Thomson: history. - URL: http://scientific.thomson.com/ free/essays/citationindexing/history

25. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation // Science. - 1972. - Vol. 178, N 4060. - P. 471-479.

26. Thomson: fifty years. - URL: http://scientific.thomson. com/free/essays/citationindexing/50y-citationindexing

27. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas // Science. - 1955. - Vol. 122, N 3159. - P. 108-111.

28. Martin B. R., Irvine J. Assessing basic research // Research Policy. - 1983. - Vol. 12. - P. 61-90.

29. Cozzens S. E. What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model // Scientometrics. - 1989. - Vol. 15, N 5/6. - P. 437-447.

30. Brooks T. Evidence of complex citer motivations // J. of the Amer. Soc. for Information Science. - 1986. - Vol. 37, N 1. - P. 34-36.

31. Best J. Damned lies and statistics: untangling the numbers from the media, politicians, and activists. - Berkeley : Univ. of California Press, 2001.

32. Bergstrom C. Eigenfactor: measuring the value and presitige of scholarly journals // College a. Research Libr. News. - 2007. - Vol. 68, N 5. - P. 314-316.

33. Performance indicators: good, bad, and ugly; Report of a working party on performance monitoring in the public services / S. Bird [et al.] // J. of the Royal Statist. Soc. A. - 2005. - Vol. 168, pt. 1. - P. 1-27.

34. Goldstein H., Spiegelhalter D. J. League tables and their limitations : statistic. iss. in comparisons of institut. performance // J. of the Royal Statist. Soc. A. - 1996. - Vol. 159, N 3. - P. 385-443.

35. Rossner M., Van Epps H., Hill E. Show me the data // J. of Cell Biology. - 2007. - Vol. 179, N 6. - P. 1091-1092.

36. Meho L., Yang K. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science vs. Scopus and Google Scholar // J. of the Amer. Soc. for Inform. Science a. Technology. - 2007. - Vol. 58, N 13. - P. 2105-2125.

37. Macdonald S., Kam J. Aardvark et al.: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies // J. of Inform. Science. - 2007. - Vol. 33, N 6. - P. 702-717.