Preview

Bibliosphere

Advanced search

Library and Information Education in the Digital Age: Students’ Expectations

https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2022-2-28-37

Abstract

In the context of an evolving digital environment of library education, it is important to study the needs and expectations of students as participants of the educational process and the direct consumers of educational services. This paper presents the results of a questionnaire survey of students studying on the specialty “Library and Information Activities” at the Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts. The objective of the survey was to determine the students’ vision of new trends in educational practice and the prospects for the development of library education associated with digitalization. The study was conducted by the working group as a part of the contract research “Explore trends and ways of development of library and information education in the digital age”. The survey touched upon such research areas as a promising vector for the development of library education, students’ readiness for library activities in a digital environment, and the use of information and communication technologies in the learning process. It was found that the students consider the information and technological courses as a promising vector for the development of library education (information courses as the basis for training). In the courses taught at the Faculty of Information and Document Communications, students would like to focus on remote user service, programming, data analytics, digital technologies, neural networks, nanotechnologies, digital marketing, web design basics, the creation and design of electronic resources, the basics of working with graphic editors and other. Assessing the importance of various types of library work in the digital environment, students marked “Working with electronic catalogs and databases” as the most important one. Least of all, students consider themselves ready for the “Work to create electronic information resources” and “Work to provide access to electronic information resources”. In the process of distance learning during the epidemic COVID-19, the greatest difficulty was the increase of the workload, the complication of the learning process. Of less significance were the technical communication problems. А set of measures from the viewpoint of students to improve the quality and competitive advantages of library and information education in the digital age is defined.

About the Authors

E. Yu. Kozlenko
Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts
Belarus

Kozlenko Elena Yurievna, Cand. of Pedagogical Sciences, Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor of the Department of Information and Analytical Activity

Rabkorovskaya str., 17, Minsk, 220007



N. Yu. Vaytsekhovich
Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts
Belarus

Vaytsekhovich Nadezhda Yurievna, Cand. of Pedagogical Sciences,
Assistant Professor of the Department of Information and Analytical Activity

Rabkorovskaya str., 17, Minsk, 220007



References

1. Begalinov АS, Аshilova MS and Begalinova KK (2021) On the image of higher education in the post-teen age: forming and developing a new order of thinking. Science for Education Today 11(1): 110–123. (In Russ.)

2. Galkovskaya YuN (2021) Transformation of approaches to organizing the educational process at the Faculty of Information and Document Communications of BSUKI in the context of COVID pandemic. Vesnіk Belaruskaga dzyarzhavnaga unіversіteta kul’tury і mastatstvav 4: 127–135. (In Russ.)

3. Gruzova AA (2015) E-learning technologies in library and information education. Trudy SanktPeterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury 205: 131–140. (In Russ.).

4. Zygmantovich SV (2021) Training of library and information specialists to work in a digital environment: employers’ expectations. Materialy VІІІ Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa «Biblioteka kak fenomen kul’tury». Biblioteki v usloviyakh pandemii: novye vozmozhnosti, novye resheniya. Minsk, pp. 89–96. (In Russ.).

5. Zygmantovіch SV and Kazlenka АYu (2011) Motivation of library activity in the structure of professional self-determination of future specialists. Vesnіk Belaruskaga dzyarzhavnaga unіversіteta kul’tury і mastatstvav 2: 94–101. (In Beloruss.)].

6. Klyuev VK (2018) Practice-oriented training as a priority of library staff training. Bibliografiya i knigovedenie 6: 13–18. (In Russ.)

7. Mingazova DN, Movchan NI and Sopin VF (2011) From student questionnaires to a generalized assessment of the quality of the educational process. Otkrytoe obrazovanie 1: 33–44. (In Russ.).

8. Mishova VV and Ogneva EhN (2016) Studying the motivational structure of personality as the base of the professional formation of students on training direction «Library and information activities». Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv 37-2: 143–150. (In Russ.).

9. Pavlova АS (2014) About professional orientation as the most important link in the system of continuous library and information education. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kul’tury 3: 36–41. (In Russ.).

10. Sokolov АV (2013) Informatization and humanization as guidelines of library policy. Vestnik kul’tury i iskusstv 2: 7–22. (In Russ.)

11. Yadov VА (1972) Sociological research: methodology, program, methods. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

12. Cathy ND (2017) The new education: how to revolutionize the university to prepare students for a world in flux. New York: Basic Books.

13. Horvat A, Kajberg L, Oğuz ES and Tammaro AM (2017) LIS Education. Global Library and Information Science. Berlin, Boston, 504–536. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1515/9783110413120-022.

14. Huggins S (2017). Practice-based learning in LIS education: an overview of current trends. Library Trends 66(1): 13–22.

15. Pujar SM and Tadasad PG (2016) MOOCs – an opportunity for international collaboration in LIS education. New Library World 117(5/6): 360–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-07-2015-0048.

16. Raju J (2021) Shaping LIS education for blended professionals in a pluralist information environment: global reflections. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 62(4): 366–382. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3138/jelis-62-4-2020-0024.

17. Shem M (2015) Digital library education: global trends and issues. Journal of Education and Practice 6(17): 66–70.

18. Trilling B (2009) 21st century skills: learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

19. Wang L (2018) Twinning data science with information science in schools of library and information science. Journal of Documentation 74(6): 1243–1257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2018-0036.

20. Wójcik M (2015) Potential use of augmented reality in LIS education. Education and Information Technologies 21(6): 1555–1569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10639-015-9399-z.

21. Wyman A and Imamverdiyev M (2018) Global trends and transformations in library science education. Information and Learning Sciences 119(3/4): 215–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-11-2017-0110.


Review

For citations:


Kozlenko E.Yu., Vaytsekhovich N.Yu. Library and Information Education in the Digital Age: Students’ Expectations. Bibliosphere. 2022;(2):28-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2022-2-28-37

Views: 1306


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1815-3186 (Print)
ISSN 2712-7931 (Online)