Overcoming the Interpretive Gap in Scientific Library Web Analytics Through a Cyclical Model of Synthesizing Quantitative and Qualitative Data

The article is devoted to the current challenges facing scientific libraries in the context of digitalization and high competition. The aim of the study is to develop and methodologically justify the cyclical model for synthesizing quantitative and qualitative data to overcome the interpretive gap in web analytics. It analyzes the problem of the interpretation gap that arises when relying solely on quantitative data from web analytics, which do not reveal the motives and deep information needs of users. As a solution, the author’s cyclical model is proposed, based on the system integration of quantitative web analytics data (the answer to the question “what?”) and qualitative research methods, such as surveys and usability testing (the answer to the question “why?”). The model is presented as a four-stage management framework (data collection, analysis, optimization, evaluation) for the continuous improvement of digital services. The main results are the creation of a holistic methodology that allows libraries the motion from analyzing actions to a deep understanding of users, as well as presenting a specific framework for its practical implementation. The use of the model allows one the transformation of a library into an adaptive ecosystem that effectively meets the complex information needs of the scientific community.

1. Arkhipova LI (2020) Data-driven marketing in decision making. Ekonomicheskii rost Respubliki Belarus’: globalizatsiya, innovatsionnost’, ustoichivost’. Minsk, pp. 369–370. (In Russ.)].

2. Bakaev MA (2017) Modern trends in automated usability assessment and behavioral factors in search engine algorithms. Programmnye produkty i sistemy 30 (3): 447–455. (In Russ.)].

3. Balaginin VA and Nazarov AD (2014) Webvisor, or How to increase the company’s competitiveness. BI – tekhnologii v optimizatsii biznes-protsessov. Yekaterinburg, pp. 62–64. (In Russ.)].

4. Denisov AA (2024) Comparative analysis of Yandex.Metrica and Google Analytics as policy tools for managing urban digital infrastructure. Postsovetskii materik 1: 33–47. (In Russ.)].

5. Zhemchugov AM and Zhemchugov MK (2016) Deming’s PDCA cycle. Modern development. Problemy ekonomiki i menedzhmenta 2: 3–28. (In Russ.)].

6. Zemskov AI (2010) A library as a tool for knowledge transfer. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 6: 78–81. (In Russ.)].

7. Imai M (2011) Kaizen: the key to Japan’s competitive success. 5th ed. Moscow: Alpina Publisher. (In Russ.)].

8. Kashitsyna AM, Kosykh OI and Markelova SV (2023) Service design is a new move in project management. Ekonomika i sotsium 6-1: 763–767. (In Russ.)].

9. Kryazheva MF and Nuzhdinova VS (2016) Web-analytics: the possibilities of use in library and information activities. Kul’tura: teoriya i praktika 2: 61–62. (In Russ.)].

10. Olevinskii MA (2015) Web analytics. Comparison of web analytics systems. IN SITU 4: 46–48. (In Russ.)].

11. Rykhtorova AE and Udartseva OM (2018) Website users segmentation to promote library resources and services. Bibliosfera 3: 59–67. (In Russ.)].

12. Savel’eva IP and Nikulin DN (2014) Assessment of online advertising efficiency using web analytics systems. Vestnik Yuzhno-U ral’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta 8 (3): 99–105. (In Russ.)].

13. Stukov SP and Elagina VB (2018) The Kaizen system: fundamentals, advantages and possibilities of implementation in Russian companies. Vestnik magistratury 1–3: 77–79. (In Russ.)].

14. Udartseva OM (2021) An effective library website: a data-driven approach to its management using analytical tools. Bibliosfera 2: 65–76. (In Russ.)]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/13/1815-3186-2021-2-65-75

15. Ushakova OB (2013) From reading guidance to customer focus: a paradigm shift (Experience of an enterprise technical library). Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 3: 14–21. (In Russ.)].

16. Yuldasheva OU and Pirogov DE (2021) The formation of the Data Driven marketing concept. Prakticheskii marketing 11: 3–9. (In Russ.)].

17. Yarutich DA (2025) Web analytics as the basis for the digital strategy of a modern research library. Vesnik Belaruskaga dzyarzhaunaga universiteta kul’tury i mastatstvau 3: 93–102. (In Russ.)].

18. Ali NM and Novikov BA (2020) Big data: analytical solutions, research challenges and trends. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo programmirovaniya RAN 32 (1): 181–204.] DOI: https://doi.org/10.15514/ISPRAS-2020-32(1)-10

19. Kuhlthau CC (1993) A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation 49 (4): 339–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026918

20. Wilson TD (2000) Human information behavior. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 3 (2): 49–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/576