Bibliographic information in digital culture: on the discussion problems and the results of the III International Bibliographic Congress
Abstract
The present review and analytical article devoted to the III International Bibliographic Congress provides general information about the most acute problems of modern bibliographic activity and the Congress as a whole, offers points of view on the main debatable issues: about the MARC format, DOI and bibliographic reference, national bibliographic resources.
About the Authors
A. Е. Guskov
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Technical Sciences, acting Director,
Voskhod str., 15, Novosibirsk, 630200
О. N. Zlobinskaya
Boris Yeltsin Presidential Library
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
senior Methodist,
Senatskaya square, 3, lit. A, Saint-Petersburg, 190000
D. V. Kosyakov
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Researcher
Voskhod str., 15, Novosibirsk, 630200
N. К. Lelikova
National Library of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Historical Sciences, Head of the Department of Bibliography and Local History,
Sadovaya str., 18, Saint-Petersburg, 191069
О. L. Lavrik
State Public Scientific Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sciences (Ped.), Professor, Chief Researcher,
Voskhod str., 15, Novosibirsk, 630200
References
1. Bakhturina TA (2018) From MARC 21 to the BIBFRAME model: the evolution of machine-readable formats in the US Library of Congress. Nauchnye i tekhnicheskie biblioteki 3: 62–70. (In Russ.)].
2. Ilyen J and Bourdon F (2016) In search of lost time, back to the future: UBU 2.0 (new life of the UBU Program). Bibliografiya i knigovedenie 4: 104–125. (In Russ.).
3. Litvinova NN (2020) The many-faced DOI CrossRef: do we use all functions? Nauka i nauchnaya informatsiya 3 (2/3): 155–165. (In Russ.). DOI: https:// doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2020-3-2-3-155-165.
4. Zhumer M (2009) National bibliography in the electronic era: leadership and new directions of development. Munich: K. G. Zaur. (In Russ.).
5. (1988) Functional requirements for bibliographic records : final rep. IFLA München: K. G. Zaur. (2021) Common practices for national bibliographies in the electronic age.
6. 2021 revision. IFLA Bibliographic Standing Committee. URL: https://www.ifla.org/files/ assets/bibliography/common_practices_for_national_ bibliographies_2021-01.pdf (accessed 17.05.2021).
7. Bennett R, Hengel-Dittrich Ch, O’Neil ET and Tillett BR (2006) VIAF (Virtual International Authority File): linking die Deutsche Bibliothek and Library of Congress name authority files. World library and information congress: 72nd IFLA general conf. a. council, 20–24 August 2006, Seoul, Korea. URL: https://archive.if la.org/IV/if la72/papers/ 123-Bennett-en.pdf (accessed 21.05.2021).
8. Brand A (2004) Publishers joining forces through Crossref. Serials Review 30 (1): 3–9.
9. Edmunds J (2017) BIBFRAME as empty vessel. URL: https://scholarsphere.psu.edu/concern/generic_ works/w9505064f (accessed 21.05.2021).
10. Godby CJ, Wang S and Mixter JK (2015) Library linked data in the cloud: OCLC’s experiments with new models of resource description. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.
11. Kroeger A (2013) The road to BIBFRAME: the evolution of the idea of bibliographic transition into a Post-MARC future. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 51 (8): 873–890.
12. Tennant R (2002) MARC must die. Library Journal 127 (17): 26–28.
13. Tennant R (2017) “MARC must die” 15 years on. Hanging Together. URL: https://hangingtogether.org/?p=6221 (accessed 21.05.2021).
14. Xu A, Hess K and Akerman L (2018) From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0: crosswalks. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 56 (2/3): 224–250.
15. Zaino J (2013) The Future of libraries, linked data and Schema.org extensions. DATAVERSITY. URL: https:// www.dataversity.net/the-future-of-libraries linked-data-and-schema-org-extensions/ (accessed 21.05.2021)
16.
Review
For citations:
Guskov A.Е., Zlobinskaya О.N., Kosyakov D.V., Lelikova N.К., Lavrik О.L. Bibliographic information in digital culture: on the discussion problems and the results of the III International Bibliographic Congress. Bibliosphere. 2021;(2):3-16. (In Russ.)
Views:
677
Email this article 