Bibliometry in the nanotechnology field: a comparative analysis of achievements in Russia and other countries
https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2017-1-83-92
Abstract
The article presents a comparative analysis of scientific performance of Russia in the field of nanotechnology. An initial corpus of publications was extracted from the Science Citation Index Expanded database through relevant keywords. It analyzes publications number, their citation, international co-authorship and its influence on citation for Russia and some countries among the most active in the field. Some intermediate results of implementing the Russian nanotechnology program are discussed.
About the Author
A. I. Terekhov
Central Economic-Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Busygina T. V., Lavrik O. L., Mandrinina L. A., Balutkina N. A. Database «Proceedings of employees of SB RAS on nanostructures, nanomaterials and nanotechnologies»: the structure and possibility of scientometric studies based on it. Bibliosfera, 2010, 4, 53–60. (In Russ.).
2. Busygina T. V., Elepov B. S., Zibareva I. V., Lavrik O. L., Shaburova N. N. Studies of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences in the field of nanoscience and nanotechnology: bibliometric analysis. Khimiya v interesakh ustoichivogo razvitiya, 2013, 21 (4), 463–473. (In Russ.).
3. Georgiev G. P. What destroys the Russian science and how to fight it. Pt. 2. Troitskii variant, 2015, 194, 6–7. (In Russ.).
4. Gus'kov A. E. Russian scientometrics: a review of research. Bibliosfera, 2015, 3, 75–86. (In Russ.).
5. Zibareva I. V., Zibarev A. V., Buznik V. M. Russian nanoscience: bibliometric analysis based on STN International databases. Khimiya v interesakh ustoichivogo razvitiya, 2010, 18 (2), 215–227. (In Russ.).
6. Zibareva I. V. Information resources on nanoscience, nanotechnology and nanomaterials (review). Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya. Seriya 1. Organizatsiya i metodika informatsionnoi raboty, 2015, 6, 9–29. (In Russ.).
7. Klebaner V. S., Mirabyan L. M., Terekhov A. I. Experience and problems of assessing the development of a new scientific field. Naukovedenie, 2000, 4, 106–128. (In Russ.).
8. Khul'man A. Economic development of nanotechnology: A review of indicators. Forsait, 2009, 1, 30–47. (In Russ.).
9. Bajwa R. S., Yaldram K., Hussain S. S., Ahmed T. Nanotechnology research among some leading OIC member states. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2012, 14 (9), 1–10.
10. Guan J., Ma N. China’s emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’. Research Policy, 2007, 36 (6), 880–886.
11. Huang C., Notten A., Rasters N. Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2011, 36 (2), 145–172.
12. Kostoff R. N. China/USA nanotechnology research output comparison – 2011 update. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2012, 79 (5), 986–990.
13. Lavrik O. L., Busygina T. V., Shaburova N. N., Zibareva, I. V. Nanoscience and nanotechnology in the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: bibliometric analysis and evaluation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2015, 17 (2), 1–11.
14. Leydesdorff L., Wagner C. S., Bornmann L. The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: competition and collaborations. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8 (3), 606–617.
15. Terekhov A. I. R&D on carbon nanostructures in Russia: scientometric analysis, 1990–2011. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2015, 17 (2), 1–26.
16. Terekhov A. I. Evaluating the performance of Russia in the research in nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2012, 14 (11), 1250–1267.
17. The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology: rep. to the president a. congr. on the 5th assessment of nat. nanotechnology initiative. Washington, 2014. 88 p. URL: www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_fifth_nni_review_oct2014_final.pdf (accessed 22.07.2016).
18. Tijssen R. J. W., Visser M. S., Van Leeuwen T. N. Benchmarking international scientific excellence: are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics, 2002, 54 (3), 381–397.
19. Youtie J., Shapira P., Porter A. L. Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocks. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2008, 10 (6), 981–986.
Review
For citations:
Terekhov A.I. Bibliometry in the nanotechnology field: a comparative analysis of achievements in Russia and other countries. Bibliosphere. 2017;(1):83-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2017-1-83-92
Views:
367
Email this article 